Reversible Deck Plank Design for Dual-Use Orientation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional decking systems lack versatility in orientation, limiting their ability to function as both a solid walking surface and a structure for installing deck boards perpendicular to joists without gaps, which restricts design flexibility and functionality.

Innovation Solution

A reversible decking system comprising four major structural members - wide and narrow deck planks, tongue edge cap, and groove edge cap, formed through aluminum extrusion, allowing installation in two orientations: a solid walking surface and a joist structure for perpendicular deck board installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a conventional decking system is designed for a single orientation, then it provides a solid walking surface in that orientation, but it lacks the ability to function as both a walking surface and a joist structure without gaps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation orientation flexibilityVSAvoiddecking system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The deck plank is designed with dual functionality: when installed in the first orientation, it provides a solid walking surface; when installed in the second orientation, it functions as a joist structure with gaps for ventilation and drainage. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by allowing the same component to serve different purposes based on installation orientation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The deck plank design inverts the conventional approach by making the gap features functional rather than structural. The gaps that would traditionally be considered structural limitations are repositioned to serve as ventilation and drainage features when the plank is installed in the second orientation, transforming a potential weakness into a functional advantage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If a decking system includes gaps for ventilation and drainage, then it improves airflow and water management, but it compromises the solidity of the walking surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater management and ventilationVSAvoidwalking surface solidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The deck plank's functionality dynamically changes based on installation orientation. In the first orientation, the solid top surface provides a continuous walking surface while gaps remain hidden or non-functional. In the second orientation, the same gaps become active ventilation and drainage features. This dynamic adaptability allows the system to optimize for either walking surface solidity or water/air management depending on installation choice.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The deck plank is segmented into functional zones: a solid top surface for walking and gap regions for ventilation/drainage. This segmentation allows different parts of the same component to serve different functions, with the solid portion providing structural integrity for walking and the gap portions enabling water and air management when oriented correctly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If a decking system is designed to accommodate both orientations, then it enhances design flexibility, but it requires more complex structural members and joining mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The deck plank employs asymmetric design with a distinct top surface and bottom surface, where the top surface is solid for walking and the bottom surface incorporates gap features. This asymmetric configuration enables the plank to function differently in different orientations without requiring complex adaptive mechanisms, simplifying manufacturing while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The deck plank merges multiple functions into a single component: it combines the walking surface function with ventilation and drainage functions in one integrated element. This merging eliminates the need for separate components for each function, reducing overall system complexity while achieving multi-functionality through strategic orientation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20240247499A1Reversible deck plank
Publication Date: 2024.07.25 FAIRWAY ARCHITECTURAL RAILING SOLUTIONS
  • US20240247499A1 patent drawing
  • US20240247499A1 patent drawing
  • US20240247499A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments described herein are directed to a reversible deck system. The deck system is described as reversible because it may be installed onto the deck structure in two different orientations. In a first orientation, a walking surface is facing upward. The walking surface is substantially solid (e.g., without gaps) and forms a final finished surface of a deck. In a second orientation, the walking surface is facing downward. In the downward facing orientation, a joist structure onto which deck boards may be installed is facing upward. The reversible deck system includes four major structural members, including a wide deck plank, a narrow deck plank, a tongue edge cap, and a groove edge cap. In an aspect, the major structural members may be formed through an aluminum extrusion process.