Reversible Flat Key Asymmetric Walls Cylinder Lock Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional locks and keys have limitations such as easy duplication of key blanks, limited combinations, and potential incorrect unlocking due to passive lock structure, leading to increased complexity and security risks.

Innovation Solution

A reversible flat key and cylinder lock design featuring a cylindrical stator with movable counter pins, a rotor with axial slit, and a key with a longitudinal lance having specific encryption craters and a tapered end, which interacts with pins and counter pins to enable secure rotation and insertion, making key duplication difficult and increasing combinations without adding complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional key blanks are used with simple encryption, then key duplication is easy, but security is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidkey duplication difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The key features asymmetric stepped walls (first wall higher than second wall) with encryption craters positioned specifically on the first wall. This asymmetric structure prevents simple duplication because copying apparatus must replicate the exact height differential and crater positioning, which is not achievable with traditional single-level key blanks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The key's encryption structure is segmented into multiple functional elements: the first flat longitudinal wall with encryption craters, the second lowered flat longitudinal wall, and the connecting oblique wall. This segmentation creates a multi-level encryption system that increases duplication complexity while maintaining manufacturing feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the number of pins is increased to increase combinations, then security is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of combinationsVSAvoidlock complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of increasing the number of pins (adding more elements in the same dimension), the invention adds a vertical dimension to the key structure with stepped walls at different heights. The first wall extends higher than the second wall, creating elevation differences that interact with pins to generate additional combination possibilities without adding more pins to the lock mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If passive type lock structure is used, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to incorrect unlocking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking mechanism simplicityVSAvoidcorrect unlocking assurance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The connecting oblique wall is designed to preliminarily raise the pins during key insertion before the key reaches its final position. This preliminary action ensures that pins are properly positioned and engaged with the rotor's encryption features before rotation can occur, preventing incorrect unlocking while maintaining the passive lock's operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentEP4063594A1Reversible flat key and cylinder lock with reversible flat key
Publication Date: 2022.09.28 MG SERRATURE S P A
  • EP4063594A1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1f
  • EP4063594A1 patent drawingFigure 2a~3a
  • EP4063594A1 patent drawingFigure 3b

AI summary

Reversible flat key for a cylinder lock (2), where the lock (2) comprises a cylindrical stator (3) that has a plurality of counter pins (7), a cylindrical rotor (4) that has a plurality of pins (6), each pin (6) being configured and arranged to interact with a corresponding counter pin (7) to enable the rotation of the rotor (4), where the lance (11) of the key (1) has in each primary face thereof (14) a first flat longitudinal wall (16) and a second flat longitudinal wall (17) that is parallel and lowered with respect to the first wall (16), the first wall (16) having a series of encryption elements (19) that follow in the longitudinal direction of the lance (11), the encryption elements (19) being configured and arranged to interact with corresponding pins (6) of the rotor (4) to enable the rotation of the rotor (4), the second wall (17) being configured and arranged to cooperate with a corresponding special pin (20) of the rotor (4) to enable the rotation of the rotor (4) or to enable the complete insertion of the key (1) into the slit (8) of the rotor (4).