Reversible Heat Pump Flow Configuration to Reduce Freezing Risk

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Chiller systems face challenges in efficiently heating and cooling process fluids, particularly water, due to freezing risks and limitations in cooling capacity, especially when operating in cooling modes, as existing configurations often require counter-current flow which can reduce cooling capacity and increase freezing risks.

Innovation Solution

A reversible heat pump system with a suction line economizer heat exchanger and a controller that manages the flow and superheat of the working fluid, allowing for co-current flow in cooling mode and counter-current flow in heating mode, thereby reducing freezing risks and enhancing efficiency by maintaining target superheats and temperatures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If counter-current flow is used in the heat exchanger, then heating efficiency is improved, but cooling capacity is reduced and freezing risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating efficiencyVSAvoidcooling capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between counter-current flow configuration for heating mode and co-current flow configuration for cooling mode. This dynamic reconfiguration allows the heat exchanger to optimize performance for the current operational mode, achieving high heating efficiency when needed while maintaining adequate cooling capacity and preventing freezing during cooling operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Use of energy by moving object

If counter-current flow is used in the heat exchanger, then heating efficiency is improved, but freezing risk at the evaporator increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating efficiencyVSAvoidfreezing risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The flow configuration is dynamically adjusted based on operational mode. During cooling mode, co-current flow is used which prevents excessive temperature differential at the evaporator, thereby eliminating freezing risk. During heating mode, counter-current flow is activated to maximize heating efficiency, demonstrating how dynamic reconfiguration resolves the contradiction between efficiency and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If the working fluid temperature is lowered to increase cooling capacity, then cooling performance is improved, but freezing risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoidfreezing risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic control of the working fluid temperature and flow configuration. During cooling mode, co-current flow is used which naturally limits the temperature differential, allowing the system to achieve adequate cooling capacity while maintaining the working fluid temperature above the freezing point of the process fluid, thus preventing freezing risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Object-affected harmful factors

If co-current flow is used in cooling mode, then freezing risk is reduced, but heat exchange efficiency is decreased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefreezing riskVSAvoidheat exchange efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects co-current flow configuration during cooling mode to prevent freezing, accepting the trade-off in heat exchange efficiency. During heating mode, it switches to counter-current flow to maximize efficiency. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by optimizing for the appropriate criterion depending on the operational mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively increases heating and cooling capacities while minimizing freezing risks, allowing for efficient operation across a wider range of temperatures and reducing the need for additional coolants, thus improving overall system performance and stability.

Implementation Method 1

condensed working fluid upstream of the expansion device transfers heat to superheated working fluid upstream of the compressor, at the suction line economiser heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

compressed working fluid from the compressor rejects heat at the first heat exchanger to provide condensed working fluid to a liquid line

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat rejection and condensation: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

a second heat exchanger for heat exchange with the process fluid of the chiller system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 4

expanded working fluid from the expansion device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExpansion:

Data Source

PatentUS11953240B2Reversible heat pump
Publication Date: 2024.04.09 TRANE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11953240B2 patent drawing
  • US11953240B2 patent drawing
  • US11953240B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is disclosed a reversible heat pump system 100 and a method of operating a reversible heat pump system to control the temperature of a process fluid of a chiller system 500. In a cooling mode, a working fluid is circulated for co-current flow with a process fluid at a heat exchanger 104 functioning as an evaporator heat exchanger, whereas in a heating mode, the working fluid is circulated for counter-current flow with the process fluid at the same heat exchanger 104 functioning as a condenser heat exchanger.