Reversible Cutting Insert Flank Geometry for Chip Abrasion Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cutting inserts with negative-type configurations face issues where chip abrasion damages the rake face, leading to changes in cutting performance and machining surface quality due to the narrowing of the space above the rake face and potential deviations in the insert's posture during use.

Innovation Solution

A cutting insert design featuring a major cutting edge, minor cutting edges, and connecting cutting edges with specific clearance angles, allowing for a larger gap between the flank and rotational trajectory without a negative radial rake angle, and enabling the insert to be reversed for continued use without damaging the rake face.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the radial rake angle is set to a negative value to prevent edge portion overlap, then the gap between flank and rotational trajectory increases, but the space above the rake face narrows causing poor chip discharge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegap between flank and rotational trajectoryVSAvoidchip discharge
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The flank is divided into multiple segments with different clearance angles: the first flank portion has a first clearance angle, while the second flank portion has a second clearance angle that is larger than the first. This segmentation allows different regions of the flank to serve different functions - the first portion maintains strength and prevents overlap, while the second portion creates space for chip discharge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the flank are given different geometric properties (clearance angles). The first flank portion has a smaller clearance angle optimized for preventing overlap and maintaining strength, while the second flank portion has a larger clearance angle optimized for chip discharge space. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between strength and chip discharge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Duration of action of stationary object

If the cutting insert is reversed for continued use, then the service life extends, but the rake face may be damaged by chip abrasion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice lifeVSAvoidrake face damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the flank geometry in advance to prevent chip abrasion of the rake face before it occurs. By creating sufficient space between the flank and rotational trajectory through the dual-clearance-angle design, chips are directed away from the rake face, preventing abrasion damage and enabling safe reversal for extended service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Strength

If the first minor cutting edge flank is recessed toward the center side, then the gap between flank and rotational trajectory increases, but the structural strength may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegap between flank and rotational trajectoryVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The flank is designed with non-uniform clearance angles where the first portion has a smaller angle and the second portion has a larger angle. This local differentiation allows the first portion to maintain structural integrity while the second portion provides the necessary gap for chip discharge, resolving the contradiction between gap size and structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11285550B2Cutting insert
Publication Date: 2022.03.29 TUNGALOY CORP
  • US11285550B2 patent drawing
  • US11285550B2 patent drawing
  • US11285550B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cutting insert has a cutting edge formed on part of an intersecting ridge line portion of an upper face or a lower face and a side face. The cutting edge includes a major cutting edge, a minor cutting edge, and a connecting cutting edge that connects the major cutting edge and the minor cutting edge. A minor cutting edge flank that is part of the side face and that corresponds to the minor cutting edge includes a first minor cutting edge flank that connects to the minor cutting edge and that has a clearance angle of 0°, and a second minor cutting edge flank that connects to the first minor cutting edge flank and that has a clearance angle of a negative value. A connecting cutting edge flank that is part of the side face and that corresponds to the connecting cutting edge includes a first connecting cutting edge flank that connects to the connecting cutting edge and that has a clearance angle of 0° or greater, and a second connecting cutting edge flank that connects to the first connecting cutting edge flank and has a clearance angle that is greater than the clearance angle of the first connecting cutting edge flank.