Reversible Interlocking Rail for Enclosure Wall and Roof Attachment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing enclosures lack an efficient and cost-effective solution for securing walls and roofs while preventing water ingress and noise attenuation, particularly in applications like generator enclosures.

Innovation Solution

A reversible rail system with a horizontal leg and opposing vertical legs forming a channel, allowing for secure attachment of walls and roofs, and featuring apertures and undercuts for fastening and water drainage, which can be oriented in two configurations to reduce the number of fasteners needed and prevent water entry.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If traditional enclosure methods are used to secure walls and roofs, then structural stability is achieved, but the number of fasteners increases and material costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidnumber of fasteners
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rail combines multiple functions into a single integrated component: it provides structural support, creates attachment points for fasteners, and forms a channel for water drainage. This merging eliminates the need for separate bracing elements and multiple discrete fastening mechanisms, thereby reducing the overall number of fasteners while maintaining structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rail serves multiple purposes simultaneously: it acts as a structural frame member, a fastening substrate, and a water management component through its integrated channel. This multi-functionality reduces the total component count and fastener requirements while achieving the same structural and protective outcomes as traditional multi-component systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Stability of the object's composition

If traditional enclosure methods are used to secure walls and roofs, then structural stability is achieved, but material costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidmaterial costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By combining the structural support function and the fastening function into a single rail component, material usage is optimized. The rail's integrated design eliminates redundant materials that would be required for separate bracing elements and multiple fastening systems, thereby reducing overall material costs while maintaining structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Strength

If conventional rail designs are used, then structural support is provided, but water ingress occurs and additional drainage components are needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidwater ingress
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The rail integrates a drainage channel directly into its structural body, merging the water management function with the structural support function. This eliminates the need for separate drainage components and prevents water ingress by providing an integrated pathway for water to drain away from the enclosure interior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Device complexity

If a reversible rail system is implemented, then the number of fasteners is reduced and water drainage is enabled, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of fastenersVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The rail is designed as a modular extrusion with distinct functional zones: support legs, channel sections, and fastening apertures. This segmentation allows each feature to be manufactured as an integrated part of the extrusion process, avoiding the need for post-manufacturing assembly of complex components and reducing overall manufacturing complexity despite the multi-functional design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Object-affected harmful factors

If enclosures are designed for protection and noise attenuation, then environmental protection is achieved, but the complexity of securing components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental protectionVSAvoidcomplexity of securing components
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rail serves as a universal component that simultaneously provides structural support, fastening capability, and water drainage. This multi-functionality simplifies the overall enclosure assembly process and reduces the complexity of securing components, while the enclosed structure maintains its protective and noise-attenuating functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9896842B2Interlocking panels and rail for an enclosure
Publication Date: 2018.02.20 DISCOVERY ENERGY LLC
  • US9896842B2 patent drawing
  • US9896842B2 patent drawing
  • US9896842B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rail for an enclosure includes a horizontal leg configured to alternatively secure with a roof and a skid/tank of the enclosure. A first leg of the rail connects perpendicularly to the horizontal leg and a second leg connected perpendicular to the horizontal leg and opposes the first leg. The first leg and the second leg form a channel to receive a wall of the enclosure.