Reversible Rotor Riding Trowel for Edge Debris Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Operators of self-propelled ride-on trowels face challenges when approaching the edge of a concrete pour, as they need to reverse the direction of the rotors to manage debris, which limits their field of vision and increases the risk of neck and back injuries due to contorted body positions.

Innovation Solution

The design of self-propelled power trowels with rotors configured for reverse rotation, equipped with means to reverse the direction of rotation and invertible steering controls, allowing operators to maintain a forward perspective while managing debris without reversing their field of vision, along with features like rear-facing video cameras and programmable controls for rotor speed adjustment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If the trowel operates in reverse to push debris outward at the perimeter, then debris management is improved, but the operator's field of vision is reduced and injury risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris managementVSAvoidoperator safety and visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies inversion by enabling the rotors to rotate in reverse directions compared to their normal operation. When approaching the perimeter, the system switches from normal counter-rotation to reverse rotation, allowing the trowel to move forward while maintaining the debris-pushing function that previously required reverse vehicle operation. This inversion resolves the contradiction by eliminating the need for the operator to turn around, thus maintaining both debris management effectiveness and operator safety/visibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Device complexity

If the rotors rotate in fixed directions, then the control system is simple, but the trowel cannot efficiently manage debris at the perimeter without reversing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoiddebris management efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by making the rotor rotation directions changeable rather than fixed. The control system dynamically switches between normal rotation and reverse rotation modes based on the operational context (interior vs. perimeter work). This dynamic capability allows the system to maintain simple control during normal operation while gaining enhanced debris management efficiency at the perimeter when reverse rotation is activated

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables operators to efficiently manage debris at the edge of a pour without reversing their field of vision, reducing the risk of injury and improving operational safety and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

Each of a pair of rotor assemblies is equipped with rotor blades for frictionally contacting the concrete surface and supporting the frame means thereabove

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11859395B2Riding trowel having rotors configured for reverse rotation
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 MULTIQUIP INC
  • US11859395B2 patent drawing
  • US11859395B2 patent drawing
  • US11859395B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A self-propelled power trowel for finishing a concrete surface is equipped with reversible rotors to allow an operator to reverse the direction of rotation of rotor blades. The trowel includes a rigid frame adapted for operation over a concrete surface, a pair of rotor assemblies having rotor blades tiltably connected to the rigid frame for frictionally contacting the concrete surface and supporting the rigid frame thereabove, a prime mover mounted to the rigid frame and operatively coupled to drive the rotor blades of the rotor assemblies in opposite rotational directions. Synchronous or hydraulic motors are configured for causing, responsive to manual controls, reversal of the direction of rotation of the rotor blades.