Reversible Train Running Gear Mechanical Articulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing train vehicles designed for single-track reversible operation in high space constraint areas, such as tunnels, are complex and costly to produce and maintain, with electronic coordination requirements complicating reversibility and increasing manufacturing and maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

A train of tunnel transport vehicles comprising two interconnected vehicles with a mechanical connection system that allows articulation between chassis and axles, featuring steering arms and transmission rods for angular alignment, enabling single-track movement without electronic control, thus simplifying production and maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If electronic coordination is used to control steering axles for single-track trajectory following, then trajectory accuracy is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory following accuracyVSAvoidelectronic control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electronic control systems with a pure mechanical connection system. The mechanical linkage between adjacent vehicles automatically transmits steering commands from the lead vehicle to trailing vehicles through physical connections, eliminating the need for complex electronic coordination while maintaining single-track trajectory following capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical connection system enables trailing vehicles to automatically follow the lead vehicle's trajectory without external control signals. The steering axles of trailing vehicles are passively controlled through the mechanical linkage, allowing the system to self-regulate and follow the desired path without electronic intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If electronic coordination is required for steering axles in reversible operation, then reversibility is achieved, but maintenance costs and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereversibility capabilityVSAvoidmaintenance cost and complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electronic control systems with a pure mechanical connection system. The mechanical linkage between adjacent vehicles automatically transmits steering commands from the lead vehicle to trailing vehicles through physical connections, eliminating the need for complex electronic coordination while maintaining single-track trajectory following capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables reversible operation by allowing any vehicle in the train to become the lead vehicle. The mechanical connection system automatically adapts to the new lead vehicle through pure mechanical means, eliminating the need for electronic reconfiguration or neutralization procedures when changing direction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Ease of operation

If mechanical connection systems with articulation means are used to connect vehicles, then single-track movement is enabled, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle-track movement capabilityVSAvoidmechanical connection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the train into modular vehicles, each with its own steering axles and mechanical connection points. This segmentation allows each vehicle to independently follow the trajectory while maintaining simple, standardized connection interfaces, reducing overall system complexity despite the articulated configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the functions of connection and steering control into a single mechanical linkage system. The same mechanical connection that joins vehicles also transmits steering commands, eliminating the need for separate control systems and reducing overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP2492170B1Running gear of transport vehicles with reversible operation
Publication Date: 2014.01.22 METALLIANCE
  • EP2492170B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2492170B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2492170B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

The set has two vehicles (100, 200) at head- and tail ends and connected with each other via two mechanical connecting systems (300, 400). The connecting systems couple longitudinal frames (110, 210) of the vehicles and couple adjacent axles of the vehicles, respectively. One of the connecting systems has an articulation unit for forming an angle between the frames. The other system has an articulation unit for articulating the axles to have opposite angular positions relative to the frames. Each axle is mounted and swiveled under an end of the frames.