Reversible Window Hinge Mechanism with Tensile Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing reversible window designs face challenges in providing enhanced thermal insulation, protecting hinge mechanisms, and maintaining durability due to limitations in compressive force distribution and the inability to incorporate an outer peripheral rabbet flange for additional sealing.

Innovation Solution

A reversible window design featuring a sash with a laterally extending peripheral rabbet flange that overlaps the frame, combined with hinge mechanisms where the support member only sustains tensile strain, allowing for a hermetically sealed space and protection of components from environmental factors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If an outer peripheral rabbet flange is added to provide additional sealing, then thermal insulation is improved, but the hinge mechanism becomes more complex and the sash cannot be fully reversed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal insulationVSAvoidhinge mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge mechanism is divided into separate functional components: a pivot arm for rotation, a slide for linear movement, and a support member for structural support. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, enabling the rabbet flange to extend outward without interfering with the reversal mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A slide component acts as an intermediary between the pivot arm and the frame, allowing the sash to move linearly while maintaining the sealing function of the rabbet flange. This intermediary mechanism resolves the conflict between having an extended flange for sealing and being able to reverse the sash fully.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the pivot arms are positioned on the opposite half of the sash to the movable end, then the outer plane pivots cleanly without passing the pivot arm, but an outer peripheral rabbet flange cannot be provided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing reliabilityVSAvoidreversal capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge mechanism transitions from a single-plane rotation to a two-dimensional movement pattern combining linear sliding and rotational pivoting. This dimensional change allows the rabbet flange to extend in one direction while the sash can still reverse by moving along the slide and pivoting on the pivot arm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge mechanism is made dynamic by allowing the pivot point to move along the slide during operation. This dynamic adjustment of the pivot position enables the sash to accommodate both the extended rabbet flange and the full reversal motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If compressive forces are applied to short pivot arms in existing designs, then the hinge mechanism can support the sash, but the pivot arms deform under large compressive forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehinge mechanism strengthVSAvoidpivot arm durability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of having the pivot arm withstand compressive forces, the design inverts the force distribution by using a support member that primarily sustains tensile forces. This inversion of the force type prevents deformation and improves the durability of the hinge components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The compressive force-bearing function is extracted from the pivot arm and transferred to the support member. This separation of functions allows the pivot arm to be optimized for rotation while the support member handles the structural loading, preventing deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If supplements are added to reduce compressive forces on pivot arms, then deformation is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepivot arm durabilityVSAvoidhinge mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support member is merged with the existing hinge mechanism structure, combining the functions of structural support and hinge operation into a single integrated component. This merging eliminates the need for separate supplements while maintaining reduced compressive forces on the pivot arm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3409869B1Reversible window and hinge mechanism
Publication Date: 2022.10.12 HELLSTROM PETER
  • EP3409869B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3409869B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3409869B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

A reversible and outwardly openable rabbeted window comprises a frame (10); a sash (20) with a laterally extending peripheral rabbet flange (25) which, in a closed position overlaps a portion of the frame; and two hinge mechanisms (30). Each hinge mechanism comprises; a pivot arm (36) with a first end being pivotally connected to the sash at a first pivot axis (36a) and a second end being pivotally connected to a first slide (35) at a second pivot axis (35b). The first slide is arranged linearly displaceable along a first guide (32) which is fixed to or made integral with the frame. A support member (37), with a first end is pivotally connected to the pivot arm (36) and a second end is pivotally connected to the frame. A second slide (34) is pivotally connected to an upper portion of the sash and arranged linearly displaceable along a second guide (31) which is fixed to or made integral with the frame. The support member (37) is pivotally connected to the pivot arm (36) by means of a distance member (38) such that the movement plane of the support member is laterally offset from the movement plane of the first pivot arm by a distance which is greater than the lateral extension of the rabbet flange (25). The pivot arm (36) is pivotally connected to the first slide (35) by means of a pivot mechanism (35b, 36b, 36c) which is arranged to allow the second end of the pivot arm (36) to move linearly relative to the second pivot axis (35b).