Review Management System Using Hypergraph Influence Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face challenges in identifying reliable reviews among numerous opinions about items, as current review systems do not effectively reduce the time needed to read reviews or distinguish between reliable and unreliable opinions, especially when reviewers are biased or lack credibility.

Innovation Solution

A review management system utilizing a hypergraph to identify and increase the visibility of reviews made by influential individuals within a social network, allowing users to easily form opinions by prioritizing reviews from trusted sources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If all reviews are displayed to users, then complete information is provided, but users spend excessive time reading and cannot identify reliable reviews

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview information completenessVSAvoidtime to read reviews
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and highlights only the most relevant and reliable reviews from the complete set of reviews. By using influence edges and hypergraph analysis to identify reviews from influential people, the system extracts a subset of high-value reviews that users should prioritize reading, thereby reducing time spent while maintaining information quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism (the hypergraph with influence edges) that mediates between the complete review set and the user. This intermediary analyzes relationships and influences between reviewers and users to filter and prioritize reviews, acting as a smart gateway that reduces information overload while preserving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If reviews from all users are treated equally, then fairness is maintained, but users cannot distinguish reliable opinions from unreliable ones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by treating different reviews differently based on their source characteristics. Instead of uniform treatment, the system assigns different weights and visibilities to reviews based on the influence of their authors, the relationship between reviewers and users, and the contextual relevance, thereby enhancing reliability through differentiated quality assessment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of review visibility and weight based on hypergraph analysis results. By dynamically adjusting these parameters according to influence relationships and user profiles, the system identifies and promotes reliable reviews without requiring complex manual verification processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If social network relationships are analyzed to identify influential reviewers, then review reliability is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview credibilityVSAvoidhypergraph processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-computing and storing influence relationships in the hypergraph structure before review queries are made. The influence edges and relationship data are prepared in advance, allowing the system to quickly identify credible reviewers without performing complex computations at query time, thus balancing reliability improvement with computational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10552889B2Review management system
Publication Date: 2020.02.04 ADP INC
  • US10552889B2 patent drawing
  • US10552889B2 patent drawing
  • US10552889B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for processing reviews. A request for information about an item is received from a client device. A group of the reviews for the item in the request from the reviews for items is identified. A user requesting the information about the item is identified. A set of the reviews in the group of the reviews made by a set of people having an influence on the user is identified using a hypergraph. A visibility of the set of the reviews is increased. The group of the reviews with an increased visibility for the set of the reviews is sent in a response to the request, enabling displaying the group of the reviews on a display system for the client device such that the set of the reviews is more visible than other reviews in the group of the reviews.