Automated Digital Review Summarization via Aspect Clustering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Customers face difficulties in efficiently evaluating digital item reviews due to the vast amount of information and time required to read through multiple reviews, especially when looking for specific features or experiences, which hinders their purchasing decisions.

Innovation Solution

A system that automatically generates and provides digital item review summaries by clustering relevant sentences from user reviews based on aspect data, using techniques like pointer-generator networks, to present more focused and relevant information to customers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If customers read through all reviews to evaluate an item, then they can make informed purchasing decisions, but it consumes excessive time and effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformed purchasing decisionVSAvoidtime to read reviews
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and highlights only the most relevant sentences from reviews that pertain to the customer's specific interests and the item's key features, rather than requiring customers to read through entire reviews. This extraction process isolates critical information while filtering out unnecessary content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer that automatically analyzes reviews, identifies relevant information based on customer profiles and item attributes, and presents synthesized insights. This intermediary acts as a bridge between the full review content and the customer's decision-making needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If customers filter reviews by specific features, then they can find relevant information faster, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview evaluation speedVSAvoidreview analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of reviews by pre-identifying and tagging sentences that relate to specific item features and customer interests before the customer even views them. This advance processing organizes information in a ready-to-present format, eliminating the need for complex real-time filtering interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically performs the filtering and selection of relevant review content based on customer profiles and item characteristics without requiring the customer to manually configure complex filter settings. The system serves itself by autonomously determining what information is most valuable to each customer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of information

If the system presents all review information, then customers have complete data for analysis, but the information becomes difficult to evaluate and process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview information completenessVSAvoidinformation analysis difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments review information into distinct, manageable units organized by relevance to customer interests and item features. Instead of presenting a continuous wall of text, reviews are divided into highlighted sentences and grouped insights that can be easily scanned and evaluated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of review information are presented with different levels of emphasis and detail based on their relevance to the customer's specific interests. Critical information receives prominent highlighting and prioritized positioning, while less relevant content is de-emphasized or omitted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11461822B2Methods and apparatus for automatically providing personalized item reviews
Publication Date: 2022.10.04 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US11461822B2 patent drawing
  • US11461822B2 patent drawing
  • US11461822B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This application relates to apparatus and methods for automatically determining and providing item reviews to users. In some examples, a computing device obtains review data identifying one or more reviews for each of a plurality of items. The computing device determines keywords for each of the items based on parsing the review data corresponding to each of items. The computing device may obtain data identifying engagement of items for a user during a browsing session, such as items a user has clicked on. The computing device may also obtain data identifying previous purchase transactions, or previous review postings, for the user. The computing device then determines, based on the obtained data, which keywords may be of interest the user. In some examples, the keywords are used to identify reviews of an item for the user. In some examples, summaries of the reviews are generated and displayed to the user.