Automated Review Summarization with Opinion Distribution Visualization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for summarizing reviews fail to effectively convey the range and distribution of opinions, as average ratings do not provide adequate information about the content and trends in a set of reviews, particularly when ratings are polarized, leading to a lack of insight into user views.

Innovation Solution

An automated process analyzes reviews to extract keywords, determine relevance scores, and present a visual summary of the range and distribution of opinions, using graphical indicators and categorization to enable users to quickly identify trends and access relevant reviews.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If an average rating is provided to summarize reviews, then the summarization process is simple, but the information conveyed about the distribution and content of reviews is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummarization process complexityVSAvoidinformation about review distribution and content
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the review summary into multiple components: average rating, rating distribution breakdown (number of reviews at each star level), and key topics with sentiment analysis. This segmentation allows the system to maintain simplicity while conveying comprehensive information about both the central tendency and distribution of reviews.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds dimensional information by transitioning from a single average rating value to a multi-dimensional representation that includes distribution frequency across rating levels and thematic content analysis. This transforms a one-dimensional summary into a multi-dimensional view that preserves more information while remaining manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of information

If users go through a large number of reviews to understand topics and trends, then comprehensive information is obtained, but the time and effort required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive understanding of topics and trendsVSAvoidtime to review all individual reviews
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts key topics, themes, and sentiment patterns from the full set of reviews and presents them in a condensed summary format. This extraction allows users to obtain comprehensive understanding of topics and trends without reading every individual review, significantly reducing time investment while preserving informational completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of reviews to identify and categorize key topics, sentiments, and trends before presenting them to users. This preliminary processing creates a pre-digested summary that users can consume quickly, eliminating the need for them to manually analyze each review to understand overall patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If detailed analysis of each review is performed to capture distribution patterns, then accurate information is obtained, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of review distribution informationVSAvoidsystem complexity for analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated analysis that performs detailed segmentation of rating distributions and topic extraction without requiring manual intervention. The system self-services the complex analytical tasks by automatically counting reviews at each rating level, identifying key topics through text analysis, and calculating sentiment metrics, thereby achieving high measurement precision while keeping operational complexity low.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8719283B2Summarizing reviews
Publication Date: 2014.05.06 APPLE INC
  • US8719283B2 patent drawing
  • US8719283B2 patent drawing
  • US8719283B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Summarizing a set of reviews is disclosed. In some embodiments, a set of reviews is analyzed, e.g., by an at least partially automated process. A summary of the information included in the set of reviews is provided. The summary includes a visual indication of a range and distribution of opinions expressed in the set of reviews. In some embodiments, the set of reviews includes reviews from one or more members of an online or other user community, such as customers of an online store, subscribers to a podcast, blog, or other online source of content, etc.