Unified Reward Administration System for Multi-Entity Incentive Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing reward scheme administration systems lack the ability to seamlessly integrate and manage multiple reward schemes from different entities, leading to inefficiencies and inconveniences for users, as they often require handling multiple accounts and systems, and struggle with dynamic adjustments and inter-group reward scheme management.

Innovation Solution

A computer system that pre-defines local reward schemes and obtains external reward schemes, determining triggered events to calculate and notify rewards, allowing for dynamic adjustments and integration of multiple reward schemes, thereby simplifying user experience and inter-group management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple separate reward scheme systems are used to manage different reward programs, then each specific reward scheme can be managed independently with precise control, but the overall system complexity increases and user experience deteriorates due to fragmented reward experiences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereward scheme management accuracyVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate reward scheme systems into a single unified reward administration system that can manage multiple reward schemes simultaneously. The system integrates first and second reward schemes from different entities (e.g., company and credit card company) into one platform, allowing users to participate in multiple reward programs through a single interface while maintaining independent management capabilities for each scheme.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The reward administration system is designed with universal functionality to handle diverse reward schemes from different sources. It can administer various types of reward events (purchases, sign-ups, referrals) across multiple schemes, supporting both internal company reward programs and external partner programs through a single multi-functional platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If users participate in multiple separate reward schemes, then they can earn diverse rewards from different entities, but the ease of operation decreases due to the need to manage multiple accounts and systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereward scheme diversityVSAvoiduser account management simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple reward scheme participations into a single user account interface. Users can enroll in and manage multiple reward schemes (company rewards, credit card rewards, partner rewards) through one unified account, eliminating the need to separately manage multiple accounts while maintaining access to diverse reward opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The reward administration system acts as an intermediary between users and multiple reward scheme providers. It consolidates interactions with various entities (company, credit card company, partners) into a single interface, mediating reward enrollment, tracking, and redemption across all schemes through one user account.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If a unified reward administration system manages multiple reward schemes, then user experience improves through simplified account management, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring reward events increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccount management simplicityVSAvoidreward event tracking complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments reward event detection and measurement by creating distinct processing pathways for different reward schemes and event types. It separately identifies first reward events from second reward events, tracks them through dedicated logic, and manages them independently within the unified system, reducing the complexity of detecting and measuring diverse reward events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If separate systems are used for each reward scheme, then each scheme can be precisely controlled and measured, but productivity decreases due to the need to handle multiple systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereward event measurement accuracyVSAvoidreward scheme administration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the administration of multiple reward schemes into a single automated platform that handles enrollment, tracking, and reward distribution across all schemes simultaneously. This consolidation improves productivity by eliminating the need to manually manage separate systems while maintaining precise measurement capabilities through structured event detection and dedicated processing logic for each scheme type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10504133B2Administering reward schemes
Publication Date: 2019.12.10 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10504133B2 patent drawing
  • US10504133B2 patent drawing
  • US10504133B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Administering reward schemes. A first reward scheme is predefined by a computer system, the first reward scheme defining a first reward event. A second reward scheme is obtained externally by the computer system, the second reward scheme defining a second reward event. In response to an action by a user, the computer system determines whether the first reward event or the second reward event has been triggered. If the first reward event has been triggered, the computer system calculates a first reward for the user according the first reward scheme and if the second reward event has been triggered, the computer system calculates a second reward for the user according the second reward scheme. The second reward scheme may be obtained by, and shared to, the computer system as an inheritance of rules within an organization.