RF Cable Replacement System With Fail-Safe State Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radio-frequency based cable replacement systems in industrial facilities face issues such as complexity in configuration, unpredictable latencies, single points of failure, and difficulty in diagnosing problems, including radio interference, firmware/hardware failures, and increased latency, which complicate the transmission and reception of electrical signals.

Innovation Solution

A wireless-to-wire subsystem with a point-to-point radio frequency connection that characterizes and transmits the state of electrical input signals, allowing the receiving end to recreate the original signal on a mirrored local output circuit and automatically switch to a fail-safe state in case of invalid or corrupted transmissions, using Digi International XBee-Pro modules and MSP430 microcontrollers for error detection and configuration simplification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of stationary object

If a radio-frequency network is used to replace cables, then the amount and length of cabling is reduced, but the configuration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecabling lengthVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary pairing and configuration actions during manufacturing. Transceivers are pre-paired with their counterparts and cryptographic keys are loaded before shipping, eliminating the need for complex field configuration and reducing deployment complexity despite using wireless technology

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If a radio-frequency network is used to replace cables, then installation flexibility is improved, but reliability decreases due to single points of failure and interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation flexibilityVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements fail-safe states that are configured in advance for each output. When transmission errors, interference, or failures are detected, the system automatically transitions to predetermined safe states, cushioning against reliability issues before they cause harmful effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors transmission quality and detects errors in real-time. Based on this feedback, it automatically switches to fail-safe states when problems are detected, maintaining reliability despite the inherent vulnerabilities of wireless communication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If error detection and fail-safe mechanisms are implemented, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-diagnosis and automatic failover without external intervention. Each transceiver independently monitors its own transmissions, detects errors, and switches to fail-safe states autonomously, reducing the need for complex external monitoring and control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3060994B1A robust and simple to configure cable-replacement system
Publication Date: 2018.08.22 OLEUMTECH CORP
  • EP3060994B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3060994B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3060994B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In a modular signal mirroring system each point-to-point RF transceiver end has a controller module (500) coupled to one or more I/O modules (502). The I/O modules (502) have various input and output circuits. A signal received a the near end is reconstructed at the fa end after being transmitted in an RF packet. The reconstructed signal may be the same as the input signal, inverted from the input signal or level-shifted from the input signal. It is representative of the input signal following the input signal's state after a time-quantization latency.