RF Channel Optimization via Host Controller Node Profiles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In expansive wireless communication systems, traditional methods for selecting the best RF channel can lead to areas of poor communication, intermittent connections, or total loss of communication due to inadequate channel selection, particularly as distance increases from the host controller.

Innovation Solution

A system where each node measures RF channel quietness and uploads measurements to a host controller, which builds a profile to select the best channel for the entire network, allowing operation on multiple channels in a time-slotted fashion if a single acceptable channel cannot be found, ensuring all nodes can communicate effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single channel is selected for the entire network, then communication simplicity is maintained, but communication reliability deteriorates in expansive networks where distance from host controller increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidchannel selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by allowing different portions of the network to use different channels based on their specific RF conditions. The host controller identifies multiple quiet channels and assigns them to different network portions, so that nodes experience locally optimized communication quality rather than a single uniform channel assignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the network into different portions that can operate on different channels simultaneously. By dividing the network and assigning specific channels to specific segments, the system achieves both reliability (each segment uses an appropriate channel) and manages complexity (the host controller makes centralized segmentation decisions).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If multiple channels are used simultaneously across the network, then communication reliability improves, but system complexity and interference increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic action through time-slotted communication where different channels are activated in different time slots. This allows multiple channels to be used across the network without simultaneous interference, as each channel portion is activated periodically rather than continuously, reducing complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically assigns channels to different network portions based on measured RF conditions. The host controller continuously monitors and adjusts channel assignments, making the system adaptive rather than static. This dynamic approach allows the network to maintain reliability under varying conditions without requiring complex fixed assignments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the host controller selects the quietest channel centrally, then channel selection is simple, but communication quality deteriorates at distant nodes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel selection easeVSAvoidcommunication quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by making channel selection centrally simple while achieving local quality optimization. The host controller centrally identifies multiple quiet channels and assigns them to different network portions, so distant nodes receive locally appropriate channel assignments rather than a single globally optimal channel, maintaining both ease of operation and communication quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If nodes upload measurements to host controller, then centralized channel optimization is achieved, but communication delay increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel optimization accuracyVSAvoidcommunication delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having nodes upload RF measurements to the host controller in advance, before actual communication begins. This allows the host controller to pre-analyze conditions and assign optimal channels to different network portions beforehand, achieving accurate optimization without causing delays during actual communication operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10524138B2System for RF quiet channel optimization
Publication Date: 2019.12.31 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US10524138B2 patent drawing
  • US10524138B2 patent drawing
  • US10524138B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A communications system having a network of nodes that may transmit and receive wireless signals. RF channel quietness may be measured at each node. A channel that is the best for all of the nodes may be selected. However, if all of the nodes except for one node determine that a particular channel is the best and not acceptable to the one node but that another channel is acceptable to all of the nodes, then the entire network may choose to operate on the other channel. The network may choose to operate on more than one channel in a time slotted fashion if a single acceptable channel cannot be found for all of the nodes. Channel quietness measurements may be facilitated by and uploaded to a host controller. The host controller may build a profile of measurements from the nodes for each channel.