RF Ion Guide Isobar Separation via Low-Energy Electron Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mass spectrometry techniques face interference from isobars, which are atoms or molecules with nearly the same mass as the analyte, leading to reduced sensitivity and increased costs due to the need for large, expensive accelerators to distinguish between them, especially in the analysis of rare stable or radioactive isotopes.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus utilizing high transmission devices for decelerating ions combined with low energy reactions, such as ion-molecule reactions or near resonant electron transfer in RF ion guides, to selectively separate analyte ions from their isobaric interferences by controlling the ion beam kinetic energy and using reactive gases in a reaction cell to deplete or shift the mass-to-charge values of isobars.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If high energy accelerators (30 MeV or more) are used to separate isobars through dE/dx techniques, range methods, or gas filled magnets, then isobar separation capability is improved, but device size, cost, and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveisobar separation capabilityVSAvoidaccelerator system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the energy parameter from high energy (30 MeV) to low energy (less than 30 MeV, preferably less than 10 MeV) and introduces a chemical reaction dimension by using reactive gases in a reaction cell. This transforms the separation mechanism from purely physical (dE/dx, magnetic dispersion) to a combination of chemical reactions and physical separation, enabling isobar removal at lower energies and reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces reactive gas as an intermediary substance in the reaction cell. The reactive gas molecules mediate the separation process by forming compounds preferentially with isobars, which are then removed through chemical reactions rather than direct physical separation. This intermediary approach enables separation at lower energies and reduces the need for complex high-energy accelerator components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If high energy accelerators are used to eliminate isobaric background, then detection sensitivity for rare isotopes is improved, but equipment cost and operational expense increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidequipment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the energy parameter from high energy (30 MeV or more) to low energy (less than 30 MeV, preferably less than 10 MeV) and introduces a chemical reaction dimension by using reactive gases in a reaction cell. This transforms the separation mechanism from purely physical (dE/dx, magnetic dispersion) to a combination of chemical reactions and physical separation, enabling isobar removal at lower energies and reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces expensive, complex high-energy accelerator infrastructure with simpler, more affordable low-energy equipment. The reactive gases used in the reaction cell are relatively inexpensive consumables that can be easily replenished, replacing the need for costly nuclear physics accelerators that require specialized facilities and large professional staff for operation and maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Measurement precision

If conventional AMS systems operate at high voltage (6-10 million volts) to separate isobars, then isobaric background reduction is achieved, but the physical size of the installation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveisobar separationVSAvoidaccelerator installation size
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the energy parameter from high energy (30 MeV) to low energy (less than 30 MeV, preferably less than 10 MeV) and introduces a chemical reaction dimension by using reactive gases in a reaction cell. This transforms the separation mechanism from purely physical (dE/dx, magnetic dispersion) to a combination of chemical reactions and physical separation, enabling isobar removal at lower energies and reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention adds a chemical reaction dimension to the separation process by introducing reactive gases that form compounds with isobars. This new dimension enables separation at lower energies and in a more compact configuration, replacing the need for large high-voltage accelerator infrastructure with a smaller system that uses chemical reactions to achieve the same separation goal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If high transmission arrangements of dispersive electric and magnetic deflection fields are used, then ion transmission is improved, but isobar separation capability deteriorates due to insufficient dispersion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveion transmissionVSAvoidisobar separation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces reactive gas as an intermediary substance in the reaction cell. The reactive gas molecules mediate the separation process by forming compounds preferentially with isobars, which are then removed through chemical reactions rather than direct physical separation. This intermediary approach enables separation at lower energies and reduces the need for complex high-energy accelerator components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the energy parameter from high energy (30 MeV) to low energy (less than 30 MeV, preferably less than 10 MeV) and introduces a chemical reaction dimension by using reactive gases in a reaction cell. This transforms the separation mechanism from purely physical (dE/dx, magnetic dispersion) to a combination of chemical reactions and physical separation, enabling isobar removal at lower energies and reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the necessary terminal voltage of AMS spectrometers, allowing for smaller, less expensive installations while maintaining high sensitivity and effectively separating rare isotopes from their isobaric interferences, thereby enhancing the detection capabilities of mass spectrometry.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing a high transmission device for decelerating ions in combination with low energy reactions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon deceleration:

Implementation Method 2

low energy reactions, such as ion-molecule reactions or near resonant electron transfer in RF ion guides

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon-molecule reactions: Chemical Transport Reactions

Implementation Method 3

low energy reactions, such as ion-molecule reactions or near resonant electron transfer in RF ion guides

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNear resonant electron transfer:

Implementation Method 4

The isobar is selectively depleted by electron transfer, molecular fragmentation, or other reactions between ions and gaseous targets in pressurized RF ion guides at low energies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective chemical reactions: Chemical Transport Reactions

Implementation Method 5

near resonant electron transfer in RF ion guides

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadio-frequency ion guidance:

Data Source

PatentUS7439498B2Method and apparatus for separation of isobaric interferences
Publication Date: 2008.10.21 LITHERLAND ALBERT EDWARD
  • US7439498B2 patent drawing
  • US7439498B2 patent drawing
  • US7439498B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention relates to a method and apparatus for separation of rare stable or radioactive isotopes from their atomic or molecular isobars in mass spectrometry (MS). In the present invention, the approach taken to removing atomic isobars utilizes a high transmission device for decelerating ions in combination with low energy reactions, such as ion-molecule reactions or near resonant electron transfer, in RF ion guides. The isobar is selectively depleted by electron transfer or other reactions between negative ions and gaseous targets in pressurized RF ion guides at low energies. The energy is controlled in such a way as to prevent reaction of the ion of interest while inducing reactions with the undesired isobar interference. The technique is of particular relevance to accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) for which it allows substantial reductions in the necessary terminal voltage. The effect is to allow reductions in the size and cost of AMS installations.