RF Module Test Analysis for Faster Error Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing RF module manufacturing and testing processes face challenges in identifying and addressing sources of error, such as calibration, maintenance, and technician errors, which are time-consuming and provide limited insight into errors.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for analyzing RF module test data to determine errors, including generating visualizations and alerts, recalibration settings, work orders, and training orders based on test data trends, and optimizing RF module combinations using simulation and test result data analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional RF module testing processes are used, then testing can be performed, but error identification is time-consuming and provides limited insight into error sources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror identification accuracyVSAvoidtime to identify and address errors
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the testing system into multiple specialized test stations, each dedicated to specific error types (calibration errors, maintenance errors, technician errors). This segmentation allows parallel processing of different error categories, improving both identification accuracy and reducing time loss by eliminating sequential bottlenecks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary data processing system that collects, analyzes, and correlates test data from multiple stations. This intermediary layer provides deep insight into error sources by aggregating data patterns that would be invisible in individual test results, thereby improving measurement precision without adding time loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple test stations are used to improve testing coverage, then more errors can be detected, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting coverageVSAvoidnumber of test stations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs test stations with universal capabilities to handle multiple error types and RF module variations. Each station is equipped with reconfigurable test equipment that can adapt to different testing scenarios, maintaining high reliability and coverage while reducing the total number of specialized stations needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple testing functions into integrated test stations that can perform calibration verification, maintenance checking, and technician procedure validation in a single platform. This merging reduces system complexity by eliminating the need for separate dedicated stations for each error type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20260012270A1Systems, apparatuses, and methods for testing, analyzing, and assembling RF modules
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 CAES SYSTEMS LLC
  • US20260012270A1 patent drawing
  • US20260012270A1 patent drawing
  • US20260012270A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, and associated methods are provided for testing, analyzing, and assembling radiofrequency (RF) modules. An example system includes a test station for testing an RF module, including testing mechanical, chemical, and/or electrical parameters of the RF module. The testing may involve various sources of error, and the system determines one or more types of error from the test results as well as how to address the error. From completed testing, test results may be utilized in view of expected test results to improve simulations and to determine how two or more RF module may be combined in an RF assembly.