RF Proximity Detection Using Time-of-Flight Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing object location systems, such as RFID, GPS, and computer vision, are costly, complex, or inaccurate for determining the proximity of objects in large-scale settings, particularly when only proximity information is needed.

Innovation Solution

Radio frequency (RF) proximity detection devices using narrowband and wideband signals to detect passive RFID tags, determining proximity based on time-of-flight or time-of-arrival, and triggering user interfaces like LEDs or speakers when objects are within a threshold distance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If RFID tags are used for object location, then object identification capability is improved, but system cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject location accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the proximity detection function from the full RFID system, using simple passive RFID tags combined with time-of-flight measurement to achieve location awareness without requiring active RFID readers or complex tracking infrastructure. This selective extraction reduces system complexity while maintaining the core identification capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical or optical tracking systems with electromagnetic field-based time-of-flight measurement. By using RF signals and measuring their travel time, the system achieves location detection without mechanical sensors, cameras, or complex tracking mechanisms, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If active powered locator devices are used, then object tracking accuracy is improved, but power consumption and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs passive RFID tags that do not require their own power source. Instead, the tags utilize electromagnetic energy harvested from the RF fields of existing readers to perform their identification and proximity detection functions, eliminating the need for batteries or power consumption in the tracked objects themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic time-of-flight measurements rather than continuous active tracking. By measuring the time of flight at specific intervals when objects are near detection zones, the system achieves accurate tracking without requiring continuous power consumption, maintaining accuracy while reducing energy usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If multiple sensors and systems are deployed for object detection, then detection reliability is improved, but installation complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes existing RFID readers and detection systems multi-functional by enabling them to perform both traditional RFID identification and proximity detection through time-of-flight measurement. This universal approach allows a single system to serve multiple detection purposes, improving reliability without adding separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines proximity detection capability with existing RFID infrastructure by integrating time-of-flight measurement into the same hardware and software platform used for RFID communication. This merging of functions eliminates the need for separate detection systems, reducing installation complexity while maintaining reliable detection through the combined capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides accurate, low-cost, and efficient proximity detection of objects by leveraging existing RFID infrastructure, reducing power consumption and installation complexity.

Implementation Method 1

determine a time value associated with the receiving of the second signal; determine that at least one of the time value or a distance value determined using the time value

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Implementation Method 2

receive a second signal from a remote device in response to the first signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic signal reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS12462662B2Radio frequency proximity detection devices
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP
  • US12462662B2 patent drawing
  • US12462662B2 patent drawing
  • US12462662B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes: transmitting, by a first radio frequency transceiver of a first device, a first signal; receiving, by the first radio frequency transceiver of the first device, a second signal in response to the first signal; determining a time value associated with the receiving of the second signal; determining that at least one of the time value or a distance value determined using the time value is less than or equal to a first threshold value, wherein the first threshold value is associated with the first device; and triggering a first output by a user interface component of the first device based on at least one of the time value or the distance value being less than or equal to the first threshold value.