RF Measurement RX Chain Feedback for EVM Minimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing RF measurement equipment requires cumbersome manual calibration and lacks self-optimization capabilities, leading to inefficient EVM measurements due to component variations and temperature changes, which are not addressed by conventional methods.

Innovation Solution

A method and equipment that continuously measure EVM in RX and TX chains using TX and RX feedback signals, and automatically adjust power levels with adjustable attenuators and amplifiers based on iterative optimization or machine learning techniques, triggered by user input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual calibration and adjustment of power levels is performed, then EVM measurement accuracy can be improved, but operation complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEVM measurement accuracyVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-calibration by automatically measuring EVM values and adjusting power levels without requiring manual intervention. The controller continuously monitors EVM measurements from the signal generator and adjusts the power amplifier and attenuator settings to optimize performance, allowing the system to self-optimize its EVM measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where EVM measurements are continuously taken, compared against target values, and used to automatically adjust power levels. The controller receives EVM data from the signal generator, processes this feedback information, and modifies component settings accordingly to maintain optimal measurement conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If self-optimization is implemented, then EVM optimization time is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization timeVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs optimization without requiring external intervention or complex manual procedures. The controller autonomously measures EVM values, analyzes performance data, and adjusts power levels through the power amplifier and attenuator, enabling rapid self-optimization that reduces calibration time while adding minimal complexity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calibration and optimization during manufacturing or initial setup, establishing baseline performance parameters. This preliminary action reduces the need for time-consuming optimization during ongoing operations, as the system maintains optimal settings through continuous automated monitoring and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If power levels are adjusted manually, then EVM measurements can be optimized, but productivity decreases due to cumbersome adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEVM measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors EVM measurements and automatically adjusts power levels based on real-time feedback. The controller receives performance data from the signal generator, processes this information, and dynamically modifies power amplifier and attenuator settings to maintain optimal measurement conditions without requiring manual intervention, thereby improving both accuracy and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous automated monitoring and adjustment of power levels during measurement operations. Rather than requiring discrete manual calibration steps, the system continuously optimizes performance parameters, ensuring that EVM measurements remain accurate throughout operation without interrupting productivity for recalibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12537608B2Method of error vector magnitude (EVM) minimization for a radio frequency (RF) measurement equipment, and RF measurement equipment
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 ROHDE & SCHWARZ GMBH & CO KG
  • US12537608B2 patent drawing
  • US12537608B2 patent drawing
  • US12537608B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of error vector magnitude, EVM, minimization for a radio frequency, RF, measurement equipment is provided. The method comprises: measuring the EVM of a receive, RX, chain of the RF measurement equipment in accordance with a transmit, TX, feedback signal; and responsive to a trigger event, actuating one or more power-adjusting members interposed in the RX chain in accordance with the measured EVM of the RX chain. Among others, the RF measurement equipment is thereby consistently operated based on optimal power levels in the RX chain.