RF Sensing Node Configuration Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

RF-based sensing systems face challenges in optimizing detection performance due to complex interactions between RF signals and tangible entities in a sensing area, with existing methods failing to effectively adjust configuration parameters to improve detection accuracy and reliability.

Innovation Solution

An RF system that determines and adjusts the most critical configuration parameters, such as node locations and grouping, to optimize detection performance by analyzing the impact of these parameters on sensing metrics like latency, accuracy, and signal strength, using a method that involves simulating adjustments and providing feedback to users for improving detection accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If RF-based sensing systems use complex interactions between RF signals and tangible entities to enable detailed sensing, then sensing capabilities improve, but detection performance optimization becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensing capabilitiesVSAvoiddetection performance optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the optimization process by identifying and analyzing individual configuration parameters (node locations, grouping, RF system settings) separately. Each parameter is evaluated for its impact on detection performance metrics, allowing systematic optimization without being overwhelmed by the complexity of the entire sensing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies configuration parameters such as node locations, node grouping, and RF system settings to determine which parameters have the most significant impact on detection performance. By changing and re-evaluating these parameters, the system identifies optimal configurations that maximize sensing capabilities while maintaining manageable optimization complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If existing methods fail to effectively adjust configuration parameters, then system simplicity is maintained, but detection accuracy and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where detection performance is continuously monitored and evaluated against configuration parameters. This feedback loop enables the system to identify which parameters need adjustment to improve detection accuracy, while the structured approach to parameter analysis keeps the optimization process manageable and not overly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-optimization by automatically analyzing its own detection performance and adjusting configuration parameters accordingly. The RF system evaluates its sensing metrics, identifies suboptimal parameters, and makes adjustments without requiring external intervention, thereby improving reliability while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If multiple configuration parameters are adjusted to optimize detection performance, then detection accuracy improves, but system configuration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments configuration parameters into distinct categories (node locations, grouping, RF system settings) and analyzes each category separately for its impact on detection accuracy. This segmentation allows the system to optimize multiple parameters without treating them as a monolithic complex, making the configuration process more manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of configuration parameters before final optimization. By pre-evaluating which parameters have the most significant impact on detection accuracy, the system can focus optimization efforts on the most critical parameters first, reducing the overall complexity of the configuration process while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system significantly enhances detection performance by identifying and mitigating root causes of suboptimal performance, leading to improved accuracy and reliability in sensing events like motion detection, breathing rate recognition, and occupancy monitoring.

Implementation Method 1

A first node of the at least two nodes is configured for transmitting radio frequency signals and a second node of the at least two nodes is configured for receiving the transmitted radio frequency signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The RF system is configured for performing RF-based sensing by analyzing disturbances to the radio frequency signals caused by interaction of the radio frequency signals with one or more tangible entities

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal disturbance: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS20240069160A1Optimizing detection performance of radio frequency based sensing
Publication Date: 2024.02.29 SIGNIFY HOLDING BV
  • US20240069160A1 patent drawing
  • US20240069160A1 patent drawing
  • US20240069160A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a radio frequency (RF) system with multiple nodes (34, 36, 38, 44, 46, 48) and a method for optimizing detection performance for performing RF-based sensing in a sensing area (32) based on RF system configuration parameters. An RF system configuration parameter of the RF system configuration parameters which affects detection performance of the RF-based sensing the most is determined. The RF system configuration parameter which affects detection performance of the RF-based sensing the most is then adjusted in order to optimize the detection performance of RF-based sensing. A root cause for a diminished detection performance and the respective RF system configuration parameter for mitigating it may be determined based on current context. For optimizing the detection performance, for example, settings of sensing parameters of the nodes (34, . . . , 48) may be adjusted or the nodes (34, . . . , 38) may be moved, removed, added, or replaced.