RF Tag Scanning for SMT Material Object Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In surface mount technology, material objects are often picked manually, leading to inefficiencies and errors due to staff unfamiliarity with shelf positions, similar identification numbers, and manual counting issues, resulting in incorrect picking and potential production line pauses.

Innovation Solution

An intellectual material object management method and system utilizing RF tag scanning to assist in identifying and tracking material objects, including scanning carrier and shelf tags to accurately place replenishment carriers, generating picking lists, counting remaining objects, and printing tags to avoid identification errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual picking is used, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but picking accuracy and speed deteriorate due to staff errors and unfamiliarity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicking operationVSAvoidpicking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated RF identification and verification. The picking device automatically identifies MOs, verifies them against the picking list, and records quantities without requiring staff to manually check or verify, making the system self-correcting and eliminating human error in identification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical identification and counting with automated RF electromagnetic field-based identification. The RF scanning device automatically reads MO tags and verifies them against the database, substituting human visual inspection and manual counting with electronic automated verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If manual counting and handwriting on tags is used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate due to careless or wrong handwriting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounting and tagging systemVSAvoidquantity identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual handwriting with automated electronic data processing. The picking device automatically records quantities in the database through electronic communication, eliminating handwriting entirely. The printer then automatically generates clear, machine-readable tags with precise quantity information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates electronic copies of quantity information in the database and generates printed tags as physical copies. This ensures accurate replication of data without human transcription errors, as the electronic copy is directly transferred from the database to the printed tag

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If staff manually locate MOs using ID numbers, then adaptability is maintained, but time consumption increases due to unfamiliarity with shelf positions and similar ID numbers

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMO identificationVSAvoidpicking time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual visual search and ID number matching with automated RF electromagnetic scanning. The picking device automatically detects and identifies MOs by scanning their RF tags, eliminating the need for staff to visually search or remember shelf positions and ID numbers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The RF tag acts as an intermediary carrier of MO identification information. Instead of staff directly reading ID numbers on MOs, the RF scanning device reads the RF tag information and automatically matches it with the database, serving as an intelligent mediator that accelerates identification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If manual verification by additional staff is implemented, then reliability improves, but device complexity and labor requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicking verificationVSAvoidverification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-verification through automated RF identification and database comparison. The picking device automatically verifies each scanned MO against the picking list and database records, eliminating the need for separate verification staff and making the verification function self-executing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback loops where the picking device continuously scans MOs, compares them with the picking list in real-time, and provides immediate verification feedback. The database updates quantities and provides confirmation signals, creating a closed-loop feedback system that ensures accuracy without additional personnel

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures accurate and efficient picking and placement of material objects by eliminating manual errors, reducing the need for additional staff to verify counts, and simplifying the process of finding and counting material objects, thereby preventing production line disruptions.

Implementation Method 1

a carrier tag of a replenishment carrier and a shelf tag of at least one present supplying shelf are scanned utilizing a RF scanning device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadio frequency (RF) tag scanning: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a remaining amount of remaining MOs is counted utilizing a counting device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCounting detection:

Implementation Method 3

an amount tag for the remaining MOs is printed according to the remaining amount of the remaining MOs for sticking on a remaining MO carrier

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrinting:

Data Source

PatentUS8814044B2Intellectual material object management method and system
Publication Date: 2014.08.26 WISTRON CORP
  • US8814044B2 patent drawing
  • US8814044B2 patent drawing
  • US8814044B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An intellectual material object management method includes: an RF scanning device scans a carrier tag of a replenishment carrier and a shelf tag of at least one present supplying shelf among stock shelves of a warehouse to assist for putting the replenishment carrier on a target shelf for the replenishment carrier. An MO picking list for obtaining information of at least one selected MO is received. The RF scanning device scans an MO tag of a present picking MO on a present picking shelf among the stock shelves and a list tag of the MO picking list to assist for obtaining the selected MO from the stock shelves of the warehouse. A remaining amount of remaining MOs is counted. An amount tag for the remaining MOs is printed according to the remaining amount of the remaining MOs for sticking on a remaining MO carrier for loading the remaining MOs.