RF Transceiver Synchronization for Automotive Radar Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automotive detection systems, such as radar systems, are rendered inaccurate or unworkable due to interference from third-party detection systems, where the echo collected by the victim system is often buried by the direct wave of the interferer, leading to performance issues in speed control, collision prevention, and other functionalities.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that mitigate RF interference by analyzing the received RF signal to determine timing information for the interference signal's cyclic transmission pattern, synchronizing the transmission of RF signals with this pattern to avoid or minimize interference, using techniques such as temporal alternation, delay, and frequency adjustment to align with or avoid the interferer's transmission periods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If the automotive detection system transmits RF signals continuously to maintain detection coverage, then detection coverage is improved, but interference from third-party detection systems increases causing echoes to be buried by direct waves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidRF interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic transmission of RF signals with adjustable duty cycles, alternating between transmission and listening periods. This allows the system to transmit signals for detection coverage while also listening for interference patterns from third-party systems, enabling synchronization to avoid overlapping transmissions that cause interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts transmission timing and frequency based on detected interference patterns. By continuously monitoring the RF environment and adapting transmission parameters in real-time, the system maintains detection coverage while minimizing overlap with third-party transmissions, thereby reducing interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the system synchronizes transmission with interference patterns to reduce RF interference, then interference mitigation is improved, but system complexity increases due to signal analysis and timing coordination requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRF interferenceVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-synchronization by autonomously detecting interference patterns from third-party systems and automatically adjusting its own transmission timing. The detection system analyzes received signals to identify cyclic patterns, determines timing information, and modifies its transmission schedule without external intervention, reducing the need for complex external coordination while mitigating interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where transmitted and received signals are continuously monitored to detect interference patterns. Based on this feedback, the system adjusts its transmission timing and frequency to avoid overlap with third-party systems, creating a closed-loop control mechanism that reduces interference while managing complexity through adaptive rather than purely deterministic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the system analyzes received RF signals to determine timing information for synchronization, then interference mitigation capability is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference mitigation capabilityVSAvoidsignal analysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of RF signals during listening periods to identify and characterize interference patterns before transmission periods begin. By pre-detecting cyclic patterns and determining timing information in advance, the system prepares synchronization parameters ahead of time, reducing the processing burden during critical transmission and detection phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system focuses signal analysis on specific characteristics of interference patterns, such as cyclic transmission patterns and deterministic features, rather than analyzing all aspects of the RF environment. This selective analysis approach reduces computational requirements and processing time while still achieving effective interference mitigation by targeting the most relevant signal characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10955541B2Apparatus and method for RF interference avoidance in an automotive detection system
Publication Date: 2021.03.23 MAGNA ELECTRONICS LLC
  • US10955541B2 patent drawing
  • US10955541B2 patent drawing
  • US10955541B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of mitigates RF interference from an RF interferer. An RF signal is received at an RF transceiver during a time period. The RF signal that includes, for at least a portion of the time period, an interference signal having a cyclic transmission pattern with at least one deterministic feature. The received RF signal is analyzed in order to determine timing information for the at least one deterministic feature and the associated interference signal cyclic transmission pattern. Transmission of the RF signals from the RF transceiver are synchronized with the interference signal transmission pattern based on the determined timing information to mitigate interference between the RF signals and the interference signal.