RFF Flow Modulator Switching Profile Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing RFF flow modulators face challenges in accurately calculating fill and flush volumes and times due to variations in column dimensions and flow rates, leading to inefficiencies and poor peak shapes in gas chromatography.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system for automatically adjusting the switching flow of back pressure regulated RFF flow modulators, which determines an adjusted switching flow based on actual primary and secondary column flows and desired curtain flow, thereby establishing a switching flow profile to ensure accurate fill and flush operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual adjustment of switching flow is used to account for column variations, then flow accuracy can be improved, but device complexity and operational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow accuracyVSAvoidadjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs flow calibration by executing a calibration routine that measures actual primary and secondary column flows and computes the required switching flow adjustments. The computer automatically determines calibration factors and applies them to calculate corrected switching flows for both fill and flush operations, eliminating the need for manual adjustment while maintaining high flow accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback through automated flow measurement and computation. The calibration routine measures actual column flows, compares them against expected values, and uses these feedback results to compute correction factors. These factors are then applied to adjust switching flow calculations, creating a closed-loop system that continuously improves flow accuracy without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If automated flow calibration is implemented, then ease of operation improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-calibration through an automated routine that executes without user intervention. The computer automatically measures column flows, computes calibration factors, and applies corrections to switching flow calculations. This self-service capability simplifies operation while the internal computational complexity remains managed through integrated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calibration actions before actual chromatography operations. By executing the calibration routine beforehand to determine accurate switching flow values under specific column conditions, the system prepares corrected flow parameters in advance. This preliminary action ensures that subsequent analytical operations proceed with optimized flow settings, simplifying their execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If switching flow is increased to compensate for dimensional variations, then fill and flush accuracy improves, but sample loss and breakthrough increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefill and flush volume accuracyVSAvoidsample loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the switching flow parameter based on measured column dimensions and flow characteristics. Instead of using fixed flow values, the calibration routine determines actual column flow rates and computes specific switching flow corrections tailored to each column's dimensions. This parameter change approach allows precise fill and flush volumes to be achieved while minimizing sample loss by avoiding excessive flow increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250110090A1Flow correction for back pressure regulated RFF flow modulator
Publication Date: 2025.04.03 LECO CORP
  • US20250110090A1 patent drawing
  • US20250110090A1 patent drawing
  • US20250110090A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for flow correction includes, when an RFF flow modulator in a calibration flow condition, directing initial switching flow into the RFF flow modulator in a first direction to an exhaust with pressure regulation and reducing the initial switching flow to a minimum switching flow where a pressure satisfies a regulation condition. The calibration flow condition includes a primary column flow into the RFF flow modulator from a primary column and a secondary column flow from the RFF flow modulator to a secondary column. The operations include determining an adjusted switching flow for the calibration flow condition and determining a switching flow profile based on the adjusted switching flow. When the RFF flow modulator in an operating flow condition different from the calibration flow condition, the operations include directing an operating switching flow determined based on the switching flow profile in the first direction to the exhaust.