RFID Tag Localization via Hierarchical Thresholds and Dynamic Antenna Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current RFID-based object localization systems are limited in dynamic sensing reconfiguration and do not effectively manage access control based on varying application demands, lacking advanced features for secure and efficient access management.

Innovation Solution

A networked RFID system with software modules that utilize hierarchical threshold and probabilistic calculations, along with adjustable configuration settings, to accurately localize RFID tags and manage access control through a network model, incorporating endpoints, oriented links, and semantic attributes, allowing for dynamic reconfiguration and enhanced security features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If simple location determination is used, then system complexity is reduced, but localization precision and access control capability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocalization precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the localization process into multiple independent components: RFID tag readers for signal detection, network model with endpoints and oriented links for spatial representation, and hierarchical threshold calculations for decision-making. Each component operates independently but contributes to the overall precision, allowing high measurement precision without requiring a monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic sensing reconfiguration by allowing adjustable configuration settings for RFID tag readers (RF signal strength, antenna gain, polarization, orientation) that can be modified based on application demands. This dynamic adaptability enables the system to optimize localization precision for different scenarios without permanently increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic sensing reconfiguration is implemented, then adaptability to varying demands is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensing reconfiguration capabilityVSAvoidconfiguration management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves dynamic sensing reconfiguration by changing key parameters of RFID tag readers including RF signal strength, antenna gain, antenna polarization, and antenna orientation. These parameter adjustments allow the system to adapt to varying application demands while maintaining a relatively simple hardware architecture, as the complexity is managed through software-controlled parameter modification rather than physical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If hierarchical threshold and probabilistic calculations are used, then localization accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocalization accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computational process is segmented into hierarchical levels with different threshold calculations at each level. The system performs coarse-grained filtering first using simpler threshold checks, then applies more complex probabilistic calculations only to candidate locations that pass initial filtering. This segmentation reduces overall computational complexity while maintaining high localization accuracy through multi-stage processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies probabilistic calculations selectively rather than uniformly across all possible locations. By using hierarchical threshold filtering first, the system performs complex computations only where necessary (partial action), reducing overall computational burden while maintaining accuracy in critical decision-making regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If access control features are added, then security capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control securityVSAvoidsystem functionality complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The RFID tag readers and localization system serve multiple functions: they perform both localization (determining tag positions) and access control (authorizing entry to protected areas). By making the system universal, additional security functionality is added without requiring separate dedicated hardware, thus improving security capability while minimizing the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges localization and access control functions into a unified framework. The same RFID tag readers, network model, and calculation algorithms used for localization are also employed for access control decisions. This merging allows security features to be integrated into the existing system architecture rather than adding separate complex subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10635867B2Systems and methods for object localization and path identification based on RFID sensing
Publication Date: 2020.04.28 LUCOMM TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US10635867B2 patent drawing
  • US10635867B2 patent drawing
  • US10635867B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A networked radio frequency identification system includes a plurality of radio frequency identification (RFID) tag readers, a computer in signal communication with the RFID tag readers over a network, and a software module for storage on and operable by the computer that localizes RFID tags based on information received from the RFID tag readers using a network model having endpoints and oriented links. In an additional example, at least one of the RFID tag readers includes an adjustable configuration setting selected from RF signal strength, antenna gain, antenna polarization, and antenna orientation. In a further aspect, the system localizes RFID tags based on hierarchical threshold limit calculations. In an additional aspect, the system controls a locking device associated with an access point based on localization of an authorized RFID tag at the access point and reception of additional authorizing information from an input device.