RFID Interrogation System Using Autocorrelation for Tag Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional RFID interrogation systems face challenges in reliably detecting RFID tags due to signal attenuation, noise, and interference, especially in confined spaces and environments with multiple tags, leading to inefficient inventory processes and increased manual labor costs.

Innovation Solution

An interrogation system that employs a database with prior knowledge about objects, using autocorrelation techniques and control systems to identify RFID tags by scanning and discerning additional information, allowing for simultaneous interrogation and improved signal processing to enhance detection accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If RFID tags are used for automatic data capture in confined spaces with multiple items, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to signal attenuation and interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic data capture efficiencyVSAvoidRFID tag detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by sending multiple interrogation signals at different power levels and processing responses through autocorrelation before final identification. This preliminary signal processing enables reliable detection of RFID tags even in confined spaces with signal interference, resolving the contradiction between automated productivity and detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by varying interrogation signal power levels and using autocorrelation processing to enhance signal detection. By adjusting these parameters, the system maintains high measurement precision for RFID tag identification while enabling automatic data capture in challenging environments with multiple tags and signal interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If multiple RFID tags are interrogated simultaneously in a stack, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to signal corruption and interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimultaneous item counting capabilityVSAvoidresponse detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary autocorrelation processing on received signals before final tag identification. This preliminary action separates individual tag responses from the composite signal, enabling reliable detection of multiple RFID tags simultaneously interrogated in a stack, thus maintaining both productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The autocorrelation function acts as an intermediary that processes the composite signal from multiple RFID tags. It separates and identifies individual tag responses within the mixed signal, enabling simultaneous interrogation of multiple tags while maintaining reliable detection despite signal corruption and interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If manual inspection is used to ensure accurate inventory counting, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to additional personnel and time requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory counting accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical inspection with automated RFID interrogation and autocorrelation-based signal processing. This substitution maintains measurement precision for inventory counting while dramatically improving productivity by eliminating the need for manual removal and inspection of each item.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The autocorrelation processing acts as an intermediary that enables automated systems to achieve the same measurement precision previously requiring manual inspection. By processing RFID signals through autocorrelation, the system accurately identifies individual tags in stacks without manual intervention, maintaining precision while improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables quick and reliable counting of multiple RFID tagged items in confined spaces, reducing manual unpacking and increasing the effectiveness of query and response cycles, even in hostile environments, by leveraging prior knowledge and autocorrelation methods to improve signal processing and reduce noise interference.

Implementation Method 1

an autocorrelator that processes the signal reply from the RFID tag to enhance detection accuracy and discern additional information about the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAutocorrelation:

Implementation Method 2

The RFID tag modulates the radio frequency energy impinging thereon, the backscatter of which is received and decoded by the reader

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBackscatter: Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS9135669B2Interrogation system employing prior knowledge about an object to discern an identity thereof
Publication Date: 2015.09.15 LONE STAR IP HOLDINGS LP
  • US9135669B2 patent drawing
  • US9135669B2 patent drawing
  • US9135669B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An interrogation system employable with an object having a radio frequency identification (RFID) tag and method of operating the same. In one embodiment, the interrogation system includes a database having prior knowledge about the object, and an interrogator that scans the RFID tag and discerns additional information therefrom about the object. The interrogator still further includes a control system that identifies the object based on the prior knowledge and the additional information.