Adaptive RFID Interrogator Retransmission Wait Time

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mobile RFID interrogators face challenges in effectively managing collisions and synchronizing operations due to unpredictable positions and arrangements, leading to communication errors and inefficiencies in command retransmissions, especially in environments where hard-wired synchronization is not feasible.

Innovation Solution

An RFID interrogator with a collision diagnosis unit that analyzes received signals to identify collision types and a random wait time calculation mechanism to adaptively set retransmission times, allowing for situational command retransmissions and collision resolution without the need for channel sensing or synchronization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If command retransmission is performed without adaptive wait time calculation, then communication continuity is maintained, but collision probability increases and communication efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication continuityVSAvoidcommunication efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic wait time adjustment by calculating adaptive retransmission wait times based on real-time collision detection results. Instead of using fixed wait times, the system dynamically modifies wait time parameters (c1, c2, c3) according to collision types and environmental conditions, allowing the retransmission strategy to adapt to changing communication environments and reduce collision probability while maintaining communication continuity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where collision detection results from previous transmissions are used to adjust subsequent retransmission wait times. The system continuously monitors communication status, identifies collision types (interrogator-interrogator, interrogator-tag, tag-tag), and feeds this information back into the wait time calculation algorithm to optimize retransmission timing and improve communication efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If hard-wired synchronization is used to coordinate interrogators, then collision avoidance is improved, but device mobility and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoiddevice mobility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces hard-wired mechanical synchronization connections with wireless collision detection and adaptive wait time calculation mechanisms. The system uses radio frequency communication to detect collisions and coordinate retransmissions without physical connections, enabling mobile interrogators to operate autonomously while maintaining collision avoidance capabilities through software-based coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

Each mobile interrogator independently performs collision detection and calculates its own adaptive wait times without requiring external synchronization signals from other interrogators. The system enables self-service operation where interrogators autonomously adjust their retransmission timing based on detected collision patterns, eliminating the need for hard-wired synchronization while maintaining operational coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If Listen Before Talk (LBT) is implemented to prevent simultaneous activation, then collision probability is reduced, but device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision probability reductionVSAvoidsynchronization mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of implementing full LBT mechanisms that require continuous channel sensing and complex synchronization protocols, the patent applies partial collision avoidance by using adaptive wait time calculation based on detected collision patterns. The system performs collision detection and adjustment only when needed, rather than continuously monitoring before each transmission, thereby reducing device complexity and energy consumption while still achieving collision probability reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Device complexity

If fixed wait time parameters are used for retransmission, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different collision scenarios deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewait time management complexityVSAvoidadaptability to collision types
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements parameter changes by dynamically adjusting wait time parameters (c1, c2, c3) based on detected collision types and environmental conditions. The system modifies these parameters within defined ranges to adapt retransmission timing to different scenarios (interrogator-interrogator collisions, interrogator-tag collisions, tag-tag collisions), enhancing versatility without requiring complex device architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8773242B2RFID interrogator calculating adaptive retransmission wait time and control method thereof
Publication Date: 2014.07.08 CISC SEMICON DESIGNCONSULTING
  • US8773242B2 patent drawing
  • US8773242B2 patent drawing
  • US8773242B2 patent drawing

AI summary

As an RFID interrogator calculating an adaptive retransmission wait time and a control method thereof, the RFID interrogator includes a collision diagnosis unit that analyzes data on a received signal received during a receive time in correspondence with a transmitted signal from an RF communication unit that can transmit and receive signal to and from one or more tag, verifies whether or not a collision occurs in the received signal, and diagnoses a collision type depending on an analysis result of the data on the received signal; a situational command retransmission portion that determines whether or not the command is retransmitted on the basis of the occurrence of the collision and the collision type received from the collision diagnosis unit; and a random wait time calculation portion that calculates a random wait time for retransmitting the command.