RFID Identification Tag Anonymization Under Memory Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing RFID tag technologies face security risks due to unsecured data communication and inadequate data obfuscation, leading to potential data exposure and high computational costs, especially in shipping contexts where tags have limited memory and full encryption is impractical.

Innovation Solution

Anonymization and de-anonymization of RFID tag data using internal data, such as asset information, without requiring full encryption, thereby reducing memory usage and computational overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If full encryption is applied to RFID tag data, then data security is improved, but memory usage and computational costs increase beyond what is practical for tags with limited memory

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidmemory usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential security function from full encryption, implementing a simplified anonymization scheme that removes personally identifiable information while preserving asset identification capability. This extraction approach provides security against casual observation without requiring the full computational and memory resources of traditional encryption algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of data representation by transforming readable identification codes into anonymized forms using simple mathematical operations. This parameter transformation provides a degree of security while maintaining compatibility with the limited memory constraints of RFID tags, avoiding the need for complex encryption data structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If full encryption is applied to RFID tag data, then data security is improved, but computational overhead increases beyond practical limits for tag operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs lightweight, computationally inexpensive anonymization operations that can be performed quickly with minimal energy consumption. These simple transformations serve as a disposable security layer for casual protection scenarios, consuming far less energy than full encryption while providing adequate security for the intended use case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the computational approach from complex encryption algorithms to simple parameter transformations. This reduces the computational overhead and energy consumption significantly while still providing a layer of security that obscures sensitive information from casual observation by unauthorized readers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If no data obfuscation is applied, then memory usage is minimized, but data security is compromised and sensitive information is exposed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory usageVSAvoiddata exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes only the sensitive personally identifiable information components from the data, replacing them with anonymized identifiers. This selective extraction provides security against data exposure while maintaining minimal memory usage, as only the essential anonymized code is stored rather than full encryption data structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If traditional RFID tags are used without anonymization, then ease of operation is maintained, but security risks increase due to unsecured data communication

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoiddata security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service anonymization where the RFID tag automatically performs the anonymization transformation of its own identification data. This maintains ease of operation from the user perspective while internally providing security protection, as the tag autonomously applies the security transformation without requiring external intervention or complex operational procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250307588A1Security scheme for identification tags
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICAN INC
  • US20250307588A1 patent drawing
  • US20250307588A1 patent drawing
  • US20250307588A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments are related to anonymizing an identification code using internal data. Once anonymized, the identification code may be written to a tag, such as an RFID tag. Anonymizing the identification code using internal data may protect potentially sensitive tag data from outsiders while operating while operating within tag memory constraints.