RFID Tag Antenna Loop Inductance for Impedance Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing radio frequency identification (RFID) tags face challenges in impedance matching with circuit chips having small capacitance, leading to reduced communication distances and antenna gain when trying to maintain a compact size.

Innovation Solution

A radio frequency identification tag design featuring a resilient base sheet, an electronic component, a reinforcing member with a concave shape, and an antenna with a loop-shaped inductance portion and spiral dipole section, where the inductance portion is partly covered by the reinforcing member, ensuring sufficient length and width variations to achieve impedance matching with small capacitance circuit chips, and is encapsulated in resin for durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the antenna size is reduced to maintain a compact tag size, then the tag becomes more compact, but the communication distance and antenna gain are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetag sizeVSAvoidcommunication distance
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The inductance portion is designed with a loop shape that extends in multiple dimensions, particularly utilizing the width dimension more effectively. The loop configuration allows the antenna to achieve sufficient inductance value and effective area without increasing the overall tag length, thereby maintaining compact size while preserving communication distance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The antenna design applies different geometric characteristics to different portions: the inductance portion uses a loop shape with optimized width-to-length ratio to maximize inductance density, while the dipole portion maintains traditional geometry. This localized optimization allows the inductance portion to contribute more effectively to impedance matching within a compact footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Volume of moving object

If the antenna size is reduced to maintain a compact tag size, then the tag becomes more compact, but the antenna gain is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetag sizeVSAvoidantenna gain
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The loop-shaped inductance portion increases the effective current path length and inductance value without proportionally increasing the physical footprint. By optimizing the loop geometry (width, height, and curvature), the antenna achieves higher inductance density, which improves impedance matching and thereby maintains antenna gain despite reduced overall size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The antenna incorporates a resin layer with specific dielectric properties positioned adjacent to the inductance portion. This dielectric material concentrates electromagnetic fields in the region of the loop, enhancing the effective inductance and improving radiation efficiency, thus maintaining antenna gain in a compact configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If the inductance portion width is increased to improve impedance matching, then the impedance matching improves, but the tag area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpedance matchingVSAvoidtag area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The loop configuration transforms the inductance generation from a primarily linear dimension (length) to a two-dimensional structure (width and height). This allows the antenna to achieve the required inductance value for impedance matching with small-capacitance chips while maintaining a compact overall area, as the loop encloses magnetic flux more efficiently than a straight conductor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If the inductance portion length is increased to improve impedance matching, then the impedance matching improves, but the tag length increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpedance matchingVSAvoidtag length
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The loop-shaped inductance portion utilizes vertical and lateral dimensions rather than extending only in the longitudinal direction. By forming a closed loop with optimized width and height, the antenna achieves sufficient inductance value without increasing the tag length, allowing impedance matching to be achieved within a compact longitudinal footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances communication distance and maintains a compact size by securing sufficient antenna length and area, suppressing antenna gain reduction, and improving durability through resin encapsulation, while being compatible with various frequency bands.

Implementation Method 1

resonating the inductance of the antenna and the capacitance of the circuit chip

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

The antenna includes an inductance section and a dipole section... performs impedance matching with the circuit chip

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic Induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP2182472B1Radio frequency identification tag and antenna
Publication Date: 2013.01.16 FUJITSU LTD
  • EP2182472B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2182472B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2182472B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A radio frequency identification tag includes: a resilient base sheet; an electronic component; a reinforcing member having at least one concave portion at a periphery of the reinforcing member; and an antenna including a dipole portion and an inductance portion, the inductance portion having an impedance matching with that of the electronic component and being formed in a loop shape; the inductance portion being partly covered by the reinforcing member, the loop shape of the inductance portion being narrowed where the loop shape runs under the concave portion of the periphery of the reinforcing member and being widened outside of the reinforcing member.