RFID Tags for Automated Laboratory Analyzer Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated laboratory analyzers face inefficiencies due to the limitations of barcode technology, including spatial requirements, data capacity, and the inability to update information on reagents and samples, which hinders optimal system architecture and safety.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of radio frequency identification (RFID) tags and readers, conforming to ISO standards, allows for efficient identification and tracking of containers and vessels by minimizing spatial requirements, increasing data capacity, and enabling updates, thus improving system efficiency and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If barcode technology is used for identification, then identification function is provided, but large surface area is required on containers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification functionVSAvoidsurface area on container
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces barcode technology (optical/mechanical system requiring line-of-sight scanning) with RFID technology (electromagnetic field-based system). RFID tags can be read through non-contact means using electromagnetic fields, eliminating the need for large visible barcodes on container surfaces while maintaining reliable identification functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the identification medium from optical barcodes requiring large surface areas to RFID tags that can be implemented on small portions of container surfaces. This parameter change in the identification technology enables compact tagging without sacrificing identification reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If barcode occupies large surface area, then identification is possible, but reagent containers and sample containers must be separated by great distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification capabilityVSAvoidseparation distance between containers
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes barcode scanning (requiring line-of-sight and separation for proper scanning) with RFID reading (using electromagnetic fields that can penetrate and operate through various materials and distances). This allows containers to be placed closer together while maintaining reliable identification through electromagnetic field-based reading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If barcode readers require variable depths of field, then barcodes can be read, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebarcode reading capabilityVSAvoidbarcode reader complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex barcode readers requiring variable depths of field and precise optical alignment with simpler RFID readers that use electromagnetic fields. RFID readers do not require line-of-sight or precise positioning, eliminating the need for complex optical systems and variable depth of field adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If barcode technology is used, then identification is provided, but data capacity is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification functionVSAvoiddata capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the identification technology from barcodes with limited data capacity to RFID tags with significantly larger memory capacity. RFID tags can store multiple data fields including sample identifiers, patient information, test types, and tracking data, whereas barcodes are limited to basic identification codes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Reliability

If barcodes are used, then identification is possible, but barcodes cannot be updated for changes in reagent or sample status

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification capabilityVSAvoidability to update information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic RFID tags that can be rewritten and updated with changing information (such as remaining tests, expiration dates, and status changes), whereas barcodes are static and cannot be modified once printed. This dynamic capability allows the identification system to adapt to changing sample and reagent states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

6Reliability

If barcode readers are used, then identification is provided, but cleaning and alignment account for half of reading problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereading capabilityVSAvoidmaintenance requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces optical barcode scanning (sensitive to dirt, damage, and misalignment) with electromagnetic field-based RFID reading (which can read through various materials and is not affected by surface conditions). This eliminates the need for cleaning and precise alignment of reading surfaces, significantly reducing maintenance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

RFID technology enhances the reliability and accuracy of data reading, ensures proper container orientation, and provides real-time updates, improving the functioning of automated analyzers, chain of custody, and patient safety by enabling accurate tracking and verification of samples and reagents.

Implementation Method 1

Radio frequency identification (hereinafter alternatively referred to as 'RFID') technology can be used as a replacement for barcodes and barcode readers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadio frequency identification: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

RFID tags can be placed on a small portion of the surface of a reagent container and read in close proximity to a RFID reader

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic field detection: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS7688207B2System for tracking vessels in automated laboratory analyzers by radio frequency identification
Publication Date: 2010.03.30 ABBOTT LAB INC
  • US7688207B2 patent drawing
  • US7688207B2 patent drawing
  • US7688207B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for automation of laboratory analyzers that utilizes radio frequency identification (RFID) tags and radio frequency identification (RFID) readers to identify containers and vessels, and the contents thereof, that are employed in the system. Radio frequency identification tags, conforming to the guidelines of ISO 14443 or ISO 15693 or ISO 18000, are positioned on the items of interest, such as, for example, reagent containers, sample containers, and microplates. These tags can be read by and written to by either a moving antenna of a RFID reader or a stationary antenna of a RFID reader. Reading of RFID tags and writing to RFID tags are controlled by software.