RFID and Computer Vision Object Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional RFID-based systems for detecting objects entering or exiting an area are prone to false positives, signal obstructions, and lack real-time response, especially when multiple RFID tags are involved or when infrastructure changes occur, leading to ineffective event capture and analysis.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that correlates RFID data with camera images using trained computer vision models to accurately detect and type objects, associating unique RFID identifiers with time thresholds and policies for areas, and utilizing motion detection sensors to capture video only when necessary, thereby reducing false positives and enhancing real-time response.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional RFID sensors are used to detect objects entering an area, then object detection capability is provided, but false positive detection occurs when RFID tags merely pass the sensors without entering the area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines RFID detection with computer vision camera systems to create a multi-modal detection system. The RFID sensor detects tags in the vicinity while the camera captures visual evidence of actual entry, and the system correlates both data sources to confirm genuine entry events, thereby eliminating false positives from RFID-only detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The computer vision system acts as an intermediary verification layer between RFID detection and final entry confirmation. The camera captures images or video frames that serve as intermediate evidence to validate whether an RFID tag detection corresponds to actual object entry into the monitored area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Area of stationary object

If RFID tags and sensors are placed throughout a facility, then object detection coverage is improved, but infrastructure changes or object movement cause signal obstructions that weaken or block signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverage areaVSAvoidsignal strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The computer vision camera system serves multiple functions: it detects object entry events, identifies object types through image analysis, provides visual verification for RFID detections, and operates independently of RFID signal strength. This multi-functionality compensates for RFID signal obstructions while maintaining comprehensive detection coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If conventional computer systems analyze RFID sensor data, then basic detection is provided, but lag time between sensor activation and analysis leads to delayed response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection response speedVSAvoidanalysis lag time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by having the camera continuously capture images or video frames of the monitored area before RFID tag entry events occur. When an RFID tag is detected, the system can immediately correlate it with pre-captured visual data, eliminating the need for post-detection image capture and reducing analysis lag time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The computer vision system operates continuously to capture images or video frames of the monitored area, ensuring that visual data is always available for immediate correlation with RFID detections. This continuous operation eliminates gaps in detection and enables real-time response to entry events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Quantity of substance

If conventional systems detect multiple RFID tags entering an area, then basic counting is provided, but the system fails to properly capture and analyze the events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of objects detectedVSAvoidevent capture accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges RFID tag detection with computer vision image analysis to accurately count and identify multiple objects entering an area simultaneously. The camera captures visual evidence of all objects present, and the system correlates this visual data with RFID detections to precisely determine the number and types of objects, eliminating inaccuracies from RFID-only multi-tag detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12056561B1Computer vision and RFID object detection
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12056561B1 patent drawing
  • US12056561B1 patent drawing
  • US12056561B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for an objection detection feature are described herein. Images of an object captured by a camera may be received along with information that includes a first timestamp. A presence of the object and a type of the object may be determined based on a computer vision model that uses the images. First RFID data may be received from an RFID sensor from an RFID tag associated with the object. The first RFID data may include a second timestamp and an identifier for the RFID tag. A determination that the object has entered the area may be determined based on the presence of the object within the images, the first RFID data, the first timestamp, and the second timestamp. A threshold for the object may be determined based on the first timestamp, the second timestamp, and one or more policies for the area.