Automated RFP Proposal Generation Using Knowledge Graphs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual process of generating proposals in response to request for proposals (RFPs) is time-consuming and error-prone, relying heavily on human analysis and manual searches within databases, which is inefficient and prone to errors, even with the use of project management tools that maintain databases of proposal contents.

Innovation Solution

A system that generates a draft proposal by creating a structured schema of an RFP, populating it with content from a repository, generating text using an organizational knowledge graph, and soliciting information from experts through a specialized user interface, thereby automating the content generation process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual processes are used to generate proposals by reading RFP documents and searching databases, then human reasoning and flexibility are maintained, but the process is time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of proposal generationVSAvoidtime required for proposal generation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically extracting requirements from RFP documents and generating proposal content without human intervention. The AI model autonomously analyzes the RFP, identifies required sections, retrieves relevant content from the database, and assembles the proposal, eliminating the need for manual reading and searching while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical human process of reading and analyzing RFP documents with an AI-based automated system. The mechanical actions of manually searching databases and assembling content are substituted with algorithmic processes that automatically extract requirements, query the database, and generate proposal sections, significantly reducing time while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If a database of past proposals is maintained to reuse content, then efficiency is improved through snippet reuse, but the process remains manual and requires keyword searching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of content reuseVSAvoidcomplexity of manual searching and selection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by automatically analyzing the RFP requirements and using this information to query the database for relevant past proposals. The AI model receives feedback from the requirement analysis and adjusts its database queries accordingly, automatically selecting and adapting appropriate content snippets without manual keyword searching, thereby improving both productivity and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an AI-based intermediary system that acts as a mediator between the RFP requirements and the database of past proposals. This intermediary automatically translates requirements into database queries, retrieves relevant content, and adapts it for reuse, eliminating the need for manual keyword searching while maintaining high efficiency in content reuse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If team members manually extract requirements and assign content generation tasks, then human oversight and quality control are maintained, but the process is complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control of proposal contentVSAvoidcomplexity of manual coordination and task assignment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the proposal generation process into distinct automated stages: requirement extraction, content retrieval, content adaptation, and assembly. Each stage is handled by the AI system independently, maintaining quality control through structured processing while eliminating the complexity of manual task assignment and coordination among team members.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The AI system performs multiple functions that were previously distributed among team members: extracting requirements, searching the database, selecting content, adapting text, and assembling the proposal. This universal system maintains quality control through consistent application of processing rules while eliminating the coordination complexity of manual multi-step workflows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10713425B2System and method for generating a proposal based on a request for proposal (RFP)
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 GENESEE VALLEY INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US10713425B2 patent drawing
  • US10713425B2 patent drawing
  • US10713425B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments described herein provide a system for generating a draft proposal. During operation, the system obtains a schema that represents a general model of a request for proposal (RFP). The system generates a structured RFP from an RFP document by structuring one or more elements of the RFP document in the structured RFP based on the schema. The system then generates a proposal outline comprising one or more sections. A respective one of the one or more sections corresponds to one of the one or more elements. The system obtains a piece of content for a respective section of the one or more sections based on a requirement specified in an element corresponding to the section and inserts the piece of content in the section of the proposal outline.