Intermeshing Rib Damper for Leak-Free Temperature-Stable Damping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing damper apparatuses have complex constructions that are prone to leakage and temperature-dependent dampening behavior, making them costly and inefficient for manufacturing and assembly, while also being sensitive to ambient conditions.

Innovation Solution

A damper apparatus with a blade or rib structure and a ridge structure that uses elastic deformation to convert kinetic energy into thermal energy, eliminating the need for fluid displacement and allowing for adjustable and temperature-independent dampening, featuring a modular design for easy adaptation to specific applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If air or hydraulic dampers with working fluid displacement are used, then dampening function is achieved, but construction complexity increases and leakage risk arises

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedampening function reliabilityVSAvoiddamper construction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the working fluid system from the damper, replacing it with a dry friction mechanism. The blade structure interacts directly with the housing through controlled friction without requiring seals, reservoirs, or fluid pathways, thereby simplifying construction while maintaining dampening reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the hydraulic/mechanical fluid displacement system with a pure mechanical friction-based damping mechanism. The blade-housing interaction generates friction forces that provide dampening without requiring any fluid medium, thus reducing construction complexity and eliminating leakage risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Force

If liquid working media such as oils are used, then dampening force is generated, but temperature-dependent viscosity changes affect dampening behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedampening forceVSAvoidtemperature independence of dampening
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces fluid-based viscous damping with solid-based friction damping. The friction force between the blade and housing depends primarily on normal force and friction coefficient, both of which are relatively temperature-independent compared to liquid viscosity. This substitution eliminates the temperature-dependent dampening behavior characteristic of oil-based dampers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental damping mechanism from viscous force (fluid-based) to friction force (solid-based). This parameter change in the physical mechanism eliminates sensitivity to temperature-induced viscosity variations, providing more consistent dampening force across different operating temperatures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If complex sealing arrangements are implemented to prevent leakage, then reliability improves, but manufacturing cost and assembly complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleakage preventionVSAvoidmanufacturing and assembly simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the sealing system entirely from the damper design by eliminating the working fluid. Without fluid containment requirements, complex seals, gaskets, and sealing arrangements are unnecessary, greatly simplifying manufacturing and assembly while maintaining reliability through the sealed-free friction mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If rotary or linear dampers with multiple components are used, then dampening capability is achieved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedampening capabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple functional components into a unified blade-housing structure. The blade serves simultaneously as the damping element, the friction surface, and the structural component, eliminating the need for separate seals, fluid reservoirs, pistons, or linkages found in traditional dampers, thereby reducing component count while maintaining dampening capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution simplifies the construction of the damper apparatus, reduces noise, and provides a consistent dampening characteristic that is independent of temperature, while being cost-effective and adaptable to various applications through modular components.

Implementation Method 1

The dampening mechanism comprises a blade or rib structure connected to the first or second damper component with a plurality of protruding regions, which are elastically deflectable at least partially or regionally in the direction of movement of the first damper component relative to the second damper component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The dampening mechanism comprises a ridge structure connected to the second or first damper component having at least one tooth or protrusion, wherein, at least in a state in which the second damper component is not moved relative to the first damper component, the at least one tooth or protrusion of the ridge structure is arranged at least partially or regionally in an intermeshing manner between two adjacent protruding regions of the blade or rib structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20240159294A1Damping Device for Reducing a Movement of a Second Component Movable Relative to a First Component
Publication Date: 2024.05.16 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US20240159294A1 patent drawing
  • US20240159294A1 patent drawing
  • US20240159294A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a damper apparatus for dampening a movement of a second part movable relative to a first part. The damper apparatus includes a first damper component, a second damper component, and a dampening mechanism arranged between the first and second damper components. The second damper component is movable, at least partially or regionally, relative to the first damper component. The dampening mechanism reduces a movement of the second damper component relative to the first damper component. The damper apparatus includes a blade or rib structure connected to the first or second damper component with protruding regions, such as blades, ribs, or knobs. The protruding regions are elastically deflectable at least partially or regionally in the direction of movement of the first damper component relative to the second damper component. The dampening mechanism includes a ridge structure connected to the second or first damper component having at least one and preferably a plurality of teeth or protrusions. The tooth or protrusion of the ridge structure is arranged at least partially or regionally in an intermeshing manner between two adjacent protruding regions of the blade or rib structure.