Ribbed Multi-Cover Airfoil Structure for Lightweight Fan Blades

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gas turbine engine components, particularly hollow fan blades, face challenges in weight reduction and structural integrity due to the need for robust construction methods that balance aerodynamic performance with material efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a recessed region in the airfoil body with ribs dividing it into pockets, which are enclosed by cover skins formed from a common cover, allowing for a lightweight yet rigid structure through welding and strategic placement of localized and peripheral cover skins, reducing material usage and enhancing fatigue life.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If robust construction methods are used to ensure structural integrity, then strength is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidcomponent weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The airfoil body is divided into multiple pockets by internal ribs, with each pocket enclosed by separate cover skins. This segmentation allows for optimized material distribution, creating a lightweight structure that maintains structural integrity through the distributed rib-pocket-skin architecture rather than requiring solid robust construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The airfoil employs a composite construction combining the airfoil body, internal ribs, and cover skins to create a multi-layered structure. This composite approach enables weight reduction while maintaining strength, as each component can be optimized for its specific function and the combined structure provides enhanced structural integrity compared to a single-material construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Weight of moving object

If material usage is reduced to decrease weight, then weight is improved, but structural integrity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent weightVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Material is strategically distributed throughout the airfoil structure with ribs positioned to provide local reinforcement at critical stress points and cover skins enclosing specific pockets. This local quality approach ensures that material is placed only where structurally necessary, reducing overall weight while maintaining integrity through targeted reinforcement rather than uniform material distribution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The segmentation into ribs and pockets creates a framework that provides structural integrity with minimal material. The ribs act as internal support structures that distribute loads, allowing the cover skins to be thinner and lighter while maintaining overall structural strength through the distributed rib framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If multiple cover skins are used to enclose pockets, then structural integrity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The airfoil is segmented into multiple pockets, each enclosed by cover skins, creating a modular structure. This segmentation provides structural benefits through distributed reinforcement while the modular nature of the pockets and cover skins simplifies the construction process, as each pocket can be independently formed and assembled

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The ribs are formed as integral portions of the airfoil body in advance, creating pre-positioned support structures that guide the subsequent attachment of cover skins. This preliminary action simplifies the overall construction process by establishing the structural framework before adding the enclosing cover skins, reducing construction complexity while maintaining structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a lighter, more efficient gas turbine engine component with improved structural integrity and reduced stress concentrations, enhancing the engine's overall performance and durability.

Implementation Method 1

A plurality of cover skins are welded to the airfoil body along the one or more ribs to enclose respective ones of the plurality of pockets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWelding: Welding

Data Source

PatentUS11852035B2Multi-cover gas turbine engine component
Publication Date: 2023.12.26 RTX CORP
  • US11852035B2 patent drawing
  • US11852035B2 patent drawing
  • US11852035B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An airfoil for a gas turbine engine according to an example of the present disclosure includes, among other things, an airfoil body extending between leading and trailing edges and extending from a root section, and the airfoil body defining pressure and suction sides. The airfoil body defines a recessed region extending inwardly from at least one of the pressure and suction sides, and the airfoil body includes one or more ribs that define a plurality of pockets within a perimeter of the recessed region. A plurality of cover skins is welded to the airfoil body along the one or more ribs to enclose respective ones of the plurality of pockets. The plurality of cover skins are formed from a common cover having a perimeter that is dimensioned to mate with the perimeter of the recess.