Ribbed Micro-Cavity Imprinting for Uniform Color Filter Arrays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for forming large-format color filter arrays are inefficient due to high costs, material wastage, and difficulty in achieving uniformity and high fill factors, particularly in imprint-and-fill processes which struggle with capillary flow and differential evaporation issues.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a substrate with a curable layer imprinted to form micro-cavities and ribs, allowing for uniform filling and curing of curable materials within these structures, which increases manufacturing speed and reduces material requirements, enabling larger fill-factor substrates with improved uniformity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If photolithographic processes are used to form color filter arrays, then color filters can be formed on substrates, but the process is expensive, time consuming, and wasteful of materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecolor filter pattern accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the photolithographic process (optical/mechanical system involving light exposure, photoresist, and etching) with a direct imprinting process using a stamp or mold. The curable material is mechanically pressed into cavities formed in the stamp, eliminating the need for photoresist coating, UV exposure, and chemical etching steps. This substitution dramatically reduces manufacturing time and material waste while maintaining pattern accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates unnecessary intermediate steps from the photolithographic process. Specifically, it removes the photoresist layer, the UV exposure step, and the chemical etching step by directly forming cavities in the curable material through mechanical imprinting. This extraction of redundant steps simplifies the process and improves productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Productivity

If imprinting processes are used to form large-format structures, then manufacturing speed increases, but uniformity and fill factor are difficult to achieve due to capillary flow and differential evaporation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing speedVSAvoiduniformity of filling
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large-format substrate into multiple smaller cavities arranged in an array, with each cavity sized to prevent capillary flow issues. By dividing the continuous large-area imprinting into discrete smaller units, uniform filling is achieved while maintaining large overall substrate coverage and high fill factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the local geometry of each cavity (size, shape, depth) to control capillary forces and prevent differential evaporation. The cavities are designed with specific dimensional characteristics that ensure uniform material distribution, addressing the local quality issue while achieving global uniformity across the large substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If subtractive photolithographic processes are used, then color filters can be formed, but material wastage is high due to etching and additional material requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecolor filter pattern accuracyVSAvoidmaterial wastage
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional subtractive approach by using an additive process. Instead of starting with a continuous layer and removing material through etching, the curable material is directly formed into cavities through imprinting. This inversion from subtraction to addition eliminates material waste from etching processes and removes the need for photoresist and other consumable materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in larger, uniformly filled imprinted structures with increased manufacturing efficiency and reduced material usage, effectively addressing the limitations of existing technologies by ensuring consistent color filtration across larger areas.

Implementation Method 1

The curable layer is imprinted and cured to form a cured layer including a layer surface and one or more micro-cavities

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS9907168B2Ribbed large-format imprinting method
Publication Date: 2018.02.27 EASTMAN KODAK CO
  • US9907168B2 patent drawing
  • US9907168B2 patent drawing
  • US9907168B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of making a filled large-format imprinted structure includes providing a substrate, locating a curable layer over the substrate, imprinting the curable layer, and curing the curable layer to form a cured layer including a layer surface and one or more imprinted micro-cavities. Each micro-cavity has a micro-cavity depth and a micro-cavity width and one or more ribs extending from the bottom of the micro-cavity toward the top of the micro-cavity. Each rib has a rib width that is less than one half of the micro-cavity width, a rib height that is less than the micro-cavity depth, and each rib separates the micro-cavity into portions, each portion having a portion width less than or equal to 20 microns. A curable material is located in each micro-cavity and cured to form cured material located in each micro-cavity, thereby defining a filled large-format imprinted structure.