Laser Scanning Microscope RICS Parameter Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for raster image correlation spectroscopy (RICS) measurements face challenges in accurately fitting mathematical transport models due to errors in sampling values, which are influenced by various complex parameters such as scan speed, pixel time, and optical properties, making manual configuration complicated and error-prone.

Innovation Solution

Automatically determining optimal scan parameters, such as spatial increment, scan speed, pixel time, and line time, to minimize errors in RICS measurements, using techniques like filtering and test scans to find best values for these parameters, ensuring high statistical quality and accuracy in model fitting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual configuration of scan parameters is used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates due to errors in sampling values

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of model fittingVSAvoidcomplexity of parameter configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines optimal scan parameters by executing test scans and evaluating sampling values without requiring manual intervention. The control unit autonomously adjusts parameters such as scan speed, pixel time, and spatial increment to minimize errors in correlations, enabling the system to self-optimize measurement quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where test scans are executed with current scan parameters, correlations are calculated, and the quality of sampling values is evaluated. Based on this evaluation, the control unit adjusts parameters to optimize future measurements, continuously improving measurement precision through feedback-driven parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If multiple test scans are performed to determine best parameters, then measurement precision improves, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatistical quality of correlationsVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs test scans and parameter optimization before actual measurement sessions. By determining optimal scan parameters in advance through automated test runs, the system prepares optimized configuration settings that can be directly applied to subsequent measurements, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual configuration during actual experiments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically varies scan parameters such as scan speed, pixel time, and spatial increment across multiple test scans to identify optimal values. This automated parameter optimization process evaluates different configurations and selects those that maximize correlation quality, reducing the time required for manual parameter tuning while improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach facilitates a low-error evaluation of RICS measurements by optimizing scan parameters, reducing manual complexity and enhancing the accuracy of diffusion constant determination, while also reducing the duration and effort required for configuration and data acquisition.

Implementation Method 1

Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) can be used to examine variable material concentrations in the microscopic size range which are brought about by diffusion processes and other transport processes in a sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluorescence: Fluorescence

Implementation Method 2

A laser scanning microscope is advisably used for scanning correlation spectroscopy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Implementation Method 3

This makes it possible to observe physical and biological transport processes in an individual volume, or through an individual volume, with a diameter of about 200 nm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS8120771B2Configuration of a laser scanning microscope for raster image correlation spectroscopy measurement and method for conducting and evaluating such a measurement
Publication Date: 2012.02.21 CARL ZEISS MICROSCOPY GMBH
  • US8120771B2 patent drawing
  • US8120771B2 patent drawing
  • US8120771B2 patent drawing

AI summary

By means of an improved configuration method, mathematical transport models can be fitted to correlations determined by means of scanning fluorescence spectroscopy with few errors. With improved methods for carrying out or evaluating a raster image correlation spectroscopy measurement (RICS) measurement, the amount of data to be stored can be reduced and RICS correlations of high statistical quality can be determined within a short period of time. For a raster image correlation spectroscopy measurement, a best value for a sampling value is determined and is specified for a subsequent scanning process on a sample. In order to carry out or evaluate a RICS measurement, sampling values are acquired or a correlation is determined exclusively in a sample region within which a pixel time (ΔP) changes along a harmonically controlled scan axis (X) by less than, or at most by, a predetermined or predeterminable value.