Ride Matching by Destination Purpose for Trusted Shared Transport

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The inefficient use of transportation capacity results in excessive vehicles on the road, environmental pollution, and urban sprawl due to the lack of effective systems to match supply and demand for transportation services, particularly in areas where public transit is inadequate or inconvenient.

Innovation Solution

A network system that matches transportation supply and demand using telecommunications and computing technology to allocate unused vehicle capacity, providing real-time information and security features to facilitate efficient and trusted sharing of rides, acting as an extension or feeder to public transit systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a centralized ridesharing system is implemented to match transportation supply and demand, then transportation efficiency is improved, but system complexity and trust establishment become problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransportation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a centralized server as an intermediary that coordinates between drivers and riders without requiring direct complex interactions between them. The server handles matching, routing, and transaction coordination, simplifying the overall system architecture while improving transportation efficiency through optimized resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where drivers and riders provide ratings and reviews after each transaction. This feedback loop builds trust over time through accumulated reputation data, allowing the system to self-regulate quality without requiring complex manual verification processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If drivers share excess transportation capacity, then resource utilization is improved, but trust and security concerns worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidtrust and security
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a rating and review mechanism where drivers and riders mutually evaluate each other after transactions. This creates a reputation system that builds trust over time, allowing resource utilization to improve while maintaining security through community-driven quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The trust verification process is automated through the platform's rating system and identity verification features, rather than requiring manual background checks. The system serves its own trust verification needs through user-generated feedback and automated security protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If real-time matching systems are deployed, then transportation availability is improved, but information processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransportation availabilityVSAvoidinformation processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores routing information, transportation capacity data, and matching algorithms before real-time requests arrive. This preliminary preparation allows the system to respond quickly to real-time matching needs without processing all information from scratch during critical moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The information processing is divided into discrete modules: location tracking, capacity verification, routing calculation, and matching logic. Each segment handles specific data types independently, reducing overall information processing complexity while maintaining real-time availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Extent of automation

If automated routing and capacity determination are implemented, then system automation is improved, but technical infrastructure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem automationVSAvoidtechnical infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Drivers and riders use their existing personal devices (smartphones, GPS units) that already contain the necessary processing capabilities. The system leverages these self-service computing resources rather than requiring specialized hardware infrastructure, reducing technical complexity while maintaining high automation levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed to work with multiple types of existing devices (smartphones, tablets, GPS units, computer systems) rather than requiring proprietary hardware. This universal compatibility approach reduces infrastructure complexity by leveraging already-deployed technological resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12579890B2Ride matching to a destination category or purpose in a shared transport system
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 CARMA TECH LTD
  • US12579890B2 patent drawing
  • US12579890B2 patent drawing
  • US12579890B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The network system triggers registration of the start of a transport journey in response to a communication of a transport user device and a transport provider device with each other, performs a continuous coordinated proximity monitoring to verify the identity of a transport user and a transport provider vehicle, and triggers registration of the end of the transport journey through communication of the transport user device and the transport provider device with each other.