Ride-sharing Server Multi-Vehicle Route Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ride-sharing mediating systems fail to provide users with convenient ride-sharing options when their desired departure and destination points are outside the planned routes of registered vehicles, leading to inconvenience for both users and drivers.

Innovation Solution

A ride-sharing mediating system that includes a server capable of receiving and comparing planned travel information from registered vehicles and ride-sharing requests from users, determining proposal routes that involve changing at least two vehicles, and transmitting these routes to user terminals for display, thereby increasing usability without decreasing driver or fellow occupant convenience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the server permits users to get in and out at positions deviating from the planned route, then the usability for users is improved, but the convenience for the driver and fellow occupants decreases due to forced detours

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveusability for usersVSAvoidconvenience for driver and fellow occupants
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the ride-sharing route into multiple fixed route sections from different vehicles. Instead of allowing continuous deviation from a single planned route, the system divides the journey into discrete segments where users can switch between vehicles at predetermined transfer points. This segmentation allows user flexibility in reaching the destination while maintaining fixed routes for each vehicle segment, thus preserving driver convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The server acts as an intermediary that coordinates multiple fixed routes and transfer points to achieve the user's overall journey goal. Rather than modifying individual vehicle routes, the server mediates by orchestrating a sequence of fixed-route vehicle segments with transfer points in between, allowing users to reach destinations outside any single planned route without forcing detours on individual vehicles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the system only matches users to vehicles with planned routes passing through desired departure and destination points, then the convenience for drivers is maintained, but the usability for users decreases when no such route exists

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvenience for driverVSAvoidusability for user
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the user's journey into multiple fixed-route vehicle segments. Instead of requiring a single vehicle to cover the entire route from departure to destination, the journey is divided into segments that can be covered by different vehicles with their own fixed planned routes. This allows users to access ride-sharing even when no single vehicle's planned route passes through both the desired departure and destination points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a temporal dimension to the route-matching problem by allowing users to transfer between vehicles at different times and locations. Instead of matching based solely on spatial coincidence of departure and destination points, the system matches based on temporal and spatial transfer points along the journey, adding another dimension to the routing solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the server provides detailed information on multiple route options including vehicle changes, then the usability for users is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveusability for userVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The server automatically performs the complex task of searching, comparing, and determining optimal multi-vehicle proposal routes based on user input and stored planned route information. This self-service automation handles the computational complexity of evaluating multiple route combinations and vehicle changes, presenting users with ready-made route options without requiring users to manually analyze complex data or perform complex calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses stored copies of planned route information from multiple vehicles to generate proposal routes. Instead of creating entirely new routes, the server combines and copies segments from existing planned routes of different vehicles, creating multi-vehicle proposal routes that leverage pre-existing route data. This copying approach reduces computational complexity compared to generating routes from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11421998B2Ride-sharing mediating system, server, program, and ride-sharing mediating method
Publication Date: 2022.08.23 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11421998B2 patent drawing
  • US11421998B2 patent drawing
  • US11421998B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A ride-sharing mediating system includes a driver terminal, a user terminal, and a server. The driver terminal receives input of planned travel information and transmits it to the server. The user terminal receives input of ride-sharing request information and transmits it to the server. The server includes a reception portion, a server controlling portion, a transmission portion, and a storage portion. The server controlling portion searches pieces of planned travel information stored in the storage portion based on the ride-sharing request information and determines a proposal route including one or more routes in which a user shares a ride in a registered vehicle from a departure point to a destination. The server controlling portion determines the proposal route by comparing, with each other, a plurality of routes including a route in which the user changes at least two registered vehicles.