Ride Verification Network for Trusted Shared Transport Capacity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The inefficient use of transport capacity in personal vehicles leads to excessive car usage, environmental issues, and the lack of effective mass transit systems due to mismatched schedules and lack of trust in sharing capacity, resulting in urban sprawl and high commuting costs.

Innovation Solution

A network system that matches supply and demand of transportation services using real-time allocation and telecommunications, providing secure, efficient, and trusted sharing of vehicle capacity with various service levels, including feeder services for public transit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If personal vehicles are used for transportation, then individual mobility is ensured, but transportation capacity is inefficiently utilized leading to excessive car usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual mobilityVSAvoidtransportation capacity utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple independent vehicles into a coordinated fleet that operates as a unified system. Vehicles are merged into shared pools that can be dynamically allocated to multiple users, transforming individual ownership into collective utilization while maintaining individual mobility access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Vehicles in the system serve multiple functions and multiple users sequentially. A single vehicle can provide transportation services to different individuals at different times, making the transportation capacity universal rather than dedicated to a single owner or user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If mass transit systems are implemented, then transportation efficiency is improved, but accessibility and scheduling flexibility are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransportation efficiencyVSAvoidscheduling flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic scheduling where vehicle allocation, routes, and timing are continuously adjusted based on real-time demand rather than fixed schedules. This allows the system to adapt flexibly to changing user needs while maintaining high operational efficiency through optimized routing and resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows users to autonomously request and book transportation services according to their specific needs without requiring centralized dispatch coordination. Users can independently access the system, specify their requirements, and receive appropriate vehicle assignments, combining self-service convenience with efficient resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If vehicle sharing is encouraged, then capacity utilization increases, but trust and security concerns arise among users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapacity utilizationVSAvoiduser trust and security
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a centralized management system that acts as an intermediary between vehicle owners and users. This intermediary verifies user identities, manages authentication, monitors vehicle usage, and handles disputes, thereby establishing trust without preventing capacity sharing. The system mediates all interactions to ensure security while maintaining high utilization rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback mechanisms including user ratings, verification systems, and monitoring protocols that build trust through transparency and accountability. User behavior is tracked and evaluated, providing feedback that enhances security and reliability while enabling broader participation in the sharing economy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If personal vehicles are owned for backup capacity, then transportation security is ensured, but urban sprawl and commuting costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransportation securityVSAvoidurban sprawl
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of each individual owning a personal vehicle for backup capacity, the system creates a virtual copy of personal vehicle access through shared fleets. Users can access vehicles on-demand as needed, replicating the security and convenience of personal ownership without the physical need for multiple individual vehicles, thereby reducing urban sprawl and commuting costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12620310B2Systems and methods for delivery verification in a shared transport network
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 CARMA TECH LTD
  • US12620310B2 patent drawing
  • US12620310B2 patent drawing
  • US12620310B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The network system triggers registration of the start of a transport journey in response to a communication of a transport user device and a transport provider device with each other, performs a continuous coordinated proximity monitoring to verify the identity of a transport user and a transport provider vehicle, and triggers registration of the end of the transport journey through communication of the transport user device and the transport provider device with each other.