Group Biofeedback via Riemannian Distance Matrix

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current biofeedback methods fail to effectively measure interaction among multiple users in real-time, especially in group settings, due to limitations in scalable interaction measures, sensitivity to outliers, and the need for extensive data points, which hinders timely and accurate monitoring and feedback.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing Riemannian geometry to compute a regularized interaction matrix from biological signals, providing biofeedback based on Riemannian distance, which is robust to autocorrelation and outliers, and adaptable to heterogeneous datasets, enabling real-time or near real-time analysis and multi-modal integration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If extended interaction measures are used to scale to multiple time-series, then the measure can handle group settings, but they require many data points and fail to provide timely measure in online monitoring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescalability to multiple time-seriesVSAvoidresponse time in online monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the interaction measurement problem into bivariate measures that can be computed independently for pairs of time-series, then combines them through regularization. This allows the system to scale to multiple users while maintaining computational efficiency suitable for real-time monitoring, avoiding the need for extensive data points required by traditional multivariate measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces regularization parameters that control the trade-off between using more data points for accuracy and providing timely feedback. By adjusting these parameters, the system can adapt to different online monitoring requirements while maintaining scalability across multiple time-series.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If extended interaction measures are used to scale to multiple time-series, then the measure can handle group settings, but they fail to provide accurate measure in the presence of outliers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescalability to multiple time-seriesVSAvoidaccuracy in presence of outliers
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces regularization as an intermediary mechanism that mediates between the bivariate interaction measures and the final multivariate assessment. This regularization process filters out the influence of outliers while preserving the scalability to handle multiple time-series, thereby maintaining both adaptability and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If bivariate interaction measures are used, then the measure is computationally efficient, but they fail to provide a modular measure that readily scale to any number of time-series

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidscalability to any number of time-series
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple bivariate interaction measures into a unified multivariate assessment through regularization. This combining approach maintains the computational efficiency of bivariate measures while achieving scalability to any number of time-series, effectively resolving the contradiction between productivity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If data integration across multiple datasets is performed, then performance in classification and prediction is improved, but the difficulty in combining data from different nature increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance in classification and predictionVSAvoiddifficulty in combining heterogeneous data
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal framework using regularization that can handle multiple types of biological signals (EEG, ECG, GSR) uniformly. This multi-functional approach improves performance in classification and prediction while reducing the complexity of combining heterogeneous data, as the same regularization process applies to all signal types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240115200A1Group biofeedback method and associated system
Publication Date: 2024.04.11 OPEN MIND INNOVATION
  • US20240115200A1 patent drawing
  • US20240115200A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for providing biofeedback to a group of users, the method being carried out a plurality of times and including acquiring at least one biological signal using at least one biological sensor for each user of the group of users, receiving, by a processor, the at least one biological signal of each user of the group of users, computing, by the processor, a regularized interaction matrix of a dataset including at least part of the received biological signals, computing, by the processor, a Riemannian distance between the regularized interaction matrix and a pre-computed regularized interaction matrix under no interaction, and providing biofeedback to the group of users using sensory means, the biofeedback being based on the computed Riemannian distance.