Mechanical Rifle Safety Insert for Power-Free Firing Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safety devices for rifles are complex and require a power supply, making them unreliable for preventing unintended firing.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical safety device with an insert for the magazine well that includes a locking element engaging in a locking groove, a firing pin safety, and a trigger safety, operated independently of a power supply, preventing unauthorized use and firing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electronic security mechanisms with biometric sensors and electric drives are used, then the safety device can provide advanced authentication and control, but the device complexity increases and a power supply is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety functionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential safety function from complex electronic systems and implements it through a simple mechanical locking element that can be removed or inserted into a locking groove, eliminating the need for power supplies and electronic components while maintaining reliable safety control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a simple, inexpensive mechanical locking element that can be easily manufactured and replaced, providing reliable safety functionality without the cost and complexity of electronic systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If electronic security mechanisms with biometric sensors and electric drives are used, then the safety device can provide advanced authentication and control, but the ease of operation decreases due to additional power supply requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety functionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes power supply requirements and electronic components from the safety mechanism, retaining only the essential mechanical locking and release functions, thereby simplifying operation while maintaining safety reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical locking element is designed to be manually operated without external power sources, allowing the user to directly control the safety function through simple manual insertion and removal actions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If a mechanical lock with locking elements and locking grooves is used, then the device complexity decreases and no power supply is needed, but the reliability of preventing unintended firing must be ensured through proper mechanical design

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidsafety function
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the safety mechanism into distinct functional segments: a locking element with locking projection, a magazine shaft with locking groove, and a trigger mechanism with safety cover, where each segment performs a specific safety function that collectively ensures reliable prevention of unintended firing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different mechanical locking solutions to different critical locations: a locking element for the magazine shaft and a safety cover for the trigger mechanism, ensuring that each vulnerable point has appropriate mechanical protection tailored to its specific function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If an insert is used to block the magazine shaft, then the ease of manufacture increases and the device is simpler, but the ability to prevent magazine feeding and unauthorized use must be achieved through effective mechanical blocking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidblocking function
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the insert as a separate, independently manufacturable component with integrated locking elements that can be produced through simple manufacturing processes and then assembled into the magazine shaft, balancing ease of manufacture with effective blocking functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The insert acts as an intermediary component between the magazine shaft and the locking mechanism, providing a simple interface that enables reliable mechanical blocking while maintaining ease of manufacture and assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP2365272B1Safety device for a rifle
Publication Date: 2018.04.18 BLASER FINANZHLDG
  • EP2365272B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2365272B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2365272B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The security device has a system box (1) with a magazine shaft (7) for the retaining of a magazine. The magazine is inserted into the magazine shaft of the rifle (21), which is moved between a release position and a locking position. A locking element (20) is provided with a locking projection.