Rigid Cage Protection Device for Electronic Component Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional protection devices for electronic components, such as memory card connectors on printed circuits, are insufficient in preventing unauthorized access due to potential deformation or displacement, which can go undetected by intrusion detection systems.

Innovation Solution

A rigid cage protection device with a security circuit formed by interconnected conductive tracks on multiple printed circuit portions, where weld spots provide both mechanical and electrical connections, ensuring secure attachment and detection of any attempts to access the electronic component.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a flexible protection circuit is used to cover electronic components, then the security coverage is improved, but the device can be easily lifted or deformed without detecting the intrusion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidintrusion detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a rigid cage structure instead of flexible films to eliminate the problem of undeformed intrusions. The rigid walls provide structural integrity and ensure that any attempt to access protected components results in detectable mechanical disruption of the conductive tracks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the flexible mechanical protection circuit with a rigid mechanical cage structure integrated with conductive tracks. This substitution provides both mechanical protection and electrical detection capabilities in a single integrated structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Stability of the object's composition

If a rigid cage protection device is used to prevent deformation, then the structural stability is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the mechanical cage structure with the security circuit by integrating conductive tracks directly into the cage walls. This combination eliminates the need for separate flexible protection circuits and simplifies the overall manufacturing process while maintaining structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cage structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides mechanical protection, structural stability, and integrates the security detection circuit. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed and simplifies manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If separate mechanical and electrical connections are made in protection devices, then the connection reliability is improved, but the manufacturing time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines mechanical support and electrical connection functions into a single integrated structure. The cage walls themselves serve as both the mechanical framework and the conductive paths, eliminating the need for separate connection operations and reducing manufacturing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cage is constructed as a composite structure with insulating wall portions and conductive track portions integrated together. This composite design allows simultaneous achievement of mechanical strength and electrical connectivity without requiring separate assembly operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides enhanced security and manufacturing simplicity by ensuring that any attempt to access the electronic component results in a detectable rupture of the conductive track, thereby preventing unauthorized access while being cost-effective and easy to manufacture.

Implementation Method 1

weld spots connecting the first wall to the second wall, at least one of the weld spots further electrically connecting the first conductive track to the second conductive track

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWelding: Welding

Data Source

PatentUS8164923B2Device for the protection of an electronic component
Publication Date: 2012.04.24 BANKS & ACQUIRERS INT HLDG SAS
  • US8164923B2 patent drawing
  • US8164923B2 patent drawing
  • US8164923B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a protection device fixed to a support and covering an electronic component. The protection device comprises at least a first wall corresponding to a first portion of printed circuit comprising at least a first conductive track, the first wall comprising at least a first mechanical guide element; at least a second wall corresponding to a second portion of printed circuit comprising at least a second conductive track, the second wall comprising at least a second mechanical guide element which interacts with the first guide element; and spot welds connecting the first wall to the second wall, at least one of the spot welds also electrically connecting the first conductive track to the second conductive track.