Rigid PCB Interconnect Structure for Data Center Cable Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large-scale electronic device configurations in data centers face challenges with complex cable management and connectivity, leading to errors and inefficiencies in interconnecting devices, as traditional methods require extensive cabling and result in confusion during servicing.

Innovation Solution

A system of interconnected printed circuit boards (PCBs) forms a cable-free assembly using horizontal and vertical ties and loopback boards, mounted on a spine structure, providing a rigid and serviceable interconnectivity solution that eliminates the need for flexible cables, allowing for easy replacement and power distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional flexible cabling is used for device interconnections, then adaptability and ease of installation are improved, but device complexity and error rates increase due to complex cable management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation flexibilityVSAvoidcable management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the flexible cabling component from the interconnection system, replacing it with a rigid PCB-based structure. This removes the source of cable management complexity while maintaining interconnection functionality through fixed routing layers and standardized connectors on the PCBs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the mechanical flexible cable system with a rigid PCB-based interconnection system. The flexible mechanical cables are replaced by rigid PCB traces and structured routing, eliminating the need for manual cable management while providing fixed, error-free signal paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If extensive cabling is used to interconnect devices, then connectivity coverage is improved, but serviceability and maintenance efficiency deteriorate due to confusion during servicing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnectivity coverageVSAvoidserviceability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the interconnection system into modular PCB units with defined connection points and routing paths. Each PCB handles specific interconnections, allowing technicians to service individual modules independently without dealing with a tangled mass of cables, thus improving serviceability while maintaining comprehensive connectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the interconnection function from flexible cables and integrates it directly into the PCB structure. This eliminates the separate cabling layer that caused serviceability issues, as connectors are now fixed to rigid PCBs with visible, organized routing paths that are easier to trace and service.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If flexible cables are used for device interconnections, then ease of installation is improved, but reliability and error rates worsen due to connection errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation easeVSAvoidconnection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical flexible cable connection system with a rigid PCB-based system featuring fixed routing and standardized connectors. This substitution eliminates the variability and error-prone nature of manual cable connections while maintaining installation simplicity through modular PCB assembly and standardized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state and properties of the interconnection medium from flexible to rigid. By transforming cables into fixed PCB traces and structured routing, the system eliminates the variability associated with flexible cable positioning and connection, thereby improving reliability while maintaining ease of installation through standardized procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If traditional cabling methods are used, then adaptability is improved, but manufacturing precision and cost effectiveness worsen due to extensive cabling requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration flexibilityVSAvoidinterconnection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes manual cabling processes with automated PCB manufacturing processes. The interconnection patterns are precisely defined during PCB fabrication using standard industry processes, eliminating the variability and imprecision associated with manual cable routing and connection, while maintaining configuration flexibility through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the manufacturing approach from manual cable assembly to automated PCB fabrication. By transitioning to rigid PCB-based interconnections manufactured through precise automated processes, the system achieves higher manufacturing precision and repeatability while maintaining adaptability through modular PCB configurations and standardized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2932725B1Substantially rigid interconnection structure for devices
Publication Date: 2017.02.01 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • EP2932725B1 patent drawing
  • EP2932725B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A substantially cable-free board connection assembly may include a plurality of printed circuit boards (PCBs) forming an interconnect plane for a plurality of electronic devices respectively attached to a plurality of plane boards included in the interconnect plane. An insertion direction for substantially all connectors is substantially perpendicular to a face of the interconnect plane. At least a portion of the board connection assembly is mounted to a support structure via a flexible connection.