Rigid Submarine Cable Joint for Multi-Core Dynamic DC Connection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current submarine power cable systems lack connectors or joints capable of connecting multi-core dynamic DC submarine power cables to static submarine power cables on the seabed, necessitating multiple buoyancy units and increased water column usage, which is inefficient and costly.

Innovation Solution

A rigid submarine power cable joint with an outer casing that accommodates a multi-core dynamic submarine power cable at one end and two single-core submarine power cables at the other, featuring armour attachment structures for secure connection and potential optical fibre integration, allowing for efficient jointing and reduced space requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If two separate dynamic DC submarine power cables are used (one for each electric pole), then the system can transmit DC power, but the water column usage increases and multiple buoyancy units are required

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDC power transmission capabilityVSAvoidwater column usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines two separate single-core DC power cables into a single multi-core dynamic submarine power cable with integrated armouring and buoyancy units. This merging reduces the water column usage and eliminates the need for separate buoyancy units for each cable, while maintaining the ability to transmit DC power for both electric poles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-core dynamic submarine power cable serves multiple functions simultaneously: it transmits DC power for both electric poles, provides integrated armouring protection, and incorporates shared buoyancy units. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by achieving reliable DC power transmission without increasing water column usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If two separate dynamic DC submarine power cables are used, then DC power transmission is enabled, but the system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDC power transmission capabilityVSAvoidnumber of buoyancy units and components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two separate cable systems into one integrated multi-core cable with shared armouring and buoyancy units. This reduces system complexity by eliminating duplicate components while maintaining DC power transmission capability for both electric poles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Volume of moving object

If a multi-core dynamic DC submarine power cable is used, then water column usage is reduced, but no connectors or joints are available to connect it to static submarine power cables on the seabed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater column usageVSAvoidavailability of connectors and joints
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the connection interface into a first axial end face with a single opening for the multi-core dynamic cable and a second axial end face with two openings for single-core static cables. This segmentation enables the multi-core cable to be connected to separate static cables on the seabed, solving the connector availability issue while maintaining the space efficiency of the multi-core design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The outer casing with its specific opening configuration acts as an intermediary that adapts the multi-core dynamic cable interface to the static cable interface. It mediates the connection between the integrated multi-core cable and the separate static cables on the seabed, resolving the incompatibility issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Strength

If armour attachment structures are added to the joint, then secure connection is achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection securityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the armour attachment structures into the outer casing itself, which serves as both the protective housing and the armour attachment substrate. This integration achieves secure connection without significantly increasing overall device complexity, as the armour attachment function is combined with the existing structural element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP4300740A1Rigid submarine power cable joint
Publication Date: 2024.01.03 NKT HV CABLES AB
  • EP4300740A1 patent drawingFigure 1~3a
  • EP4300740A1 patent drawingFigure 3b~4
  • EP4300740A1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A rigid submarine power cable joint (7) comprising: an outer casing (7a) having a first axial end face (7b) and a second axial end face at an opposite axial end of the outer casing (7a) relative to the first axial end face (7b), wherein the first axial end face (7b) comprises a single opening (7c) configured to receive a multi-core dynamic submarine power cable, and wherein the second axial end face comprises two openings, each configured to receive a respective single core submarine power cable.