Ring Busbar Current Limiter Tripping for Fast Fault Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In electrical networks, voltage drops during fault events can last for minimum four half cycles due to protection systems switching off current, causing reliability issues for voltage-sensitive devices.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of current limiters on both sides of junction points in a ring load busbar system, which are tripped simultaneously to reduce current, using tripping criteria that combine instantaneous current and rate of rise of summation currents to minimize reaction time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If protection systems switch off current during fault events, then fault current is reduced, but voltage drop duration increases to minimum four half cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault currentVSAvoidvoltage drop duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The protection system is segmented into multiple independent current limiters distributed at different locations in the ring system. Each current limiter operates independently with its own tripping criteria, allowing localized fault current reduction without requiring complete system shutdown, thereby reducing voltage drop duration while still limiting fault current effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Current limiters are pre-positioned at strategic locations in the ring system with pre-configured tripping criteria. When a fault occurs, these pre-positioned devices activate immediately based on their tripping conditions, eliminating the delay associated with detection and decision-making, thus reducing voltage drop duration to minimum while still limiting fault current.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If conventional protection relays with circuit-breakers are used, then fault protection is provided, but response time is slower compared to current limiters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault protectionVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical circuit-breaker system with electronic current limiters that use electronic sensing and switching. This substitution eliminates the mechanical operation delays inherent in traditional relays and circuit-breakers, achieving faster response times while maintaining equivalent or superior fault protection capabilities through electronic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

Current limiters are pre-configured with tripping criteria and positioned strategically in the system. Upon fault detection, they immediately execute their pre-programmed response without the detection-decision-action cycle required by conventional relays, significantly reducing response time while ensuring reliable fault protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of time

If current limiters are installed on both sides of junction points, then voltage drop time is reduced to one half cycle or less, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage drop timeVSAvoidnumber of current limiters
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ring system is segmented into multiple zones with current limiters placed at strategic junction points. This segmentation allows the system to achieve fast voltage recovery (one half cycle or less) by localizing fault current limitation to specific segments, rather than requiring system-wide protection, thereby reducing the overall number of current limiters needed while maintaining fast response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Current limiters are selectively installed at specific junction points where they provide maximum benefit based on system topology and fault patterns. This localized approach ensures fast voltage drop recovery in critical areas while avoiding unnecessary installation of current limiters in less critical sections, optimizing the balance between performance and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2909908B1Method of operate is-limiters in ring systems
Publication Date: 2024.01.17 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • EP2909908B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2909908B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

Electrical network in form of a ring system comprising several infeed transformers (T1...Tn) which are parallel arranged one to another between a sourcing busbar / cable system (1) and a ring load busbar / cable system (2), wherein the ring load busbar / cable system (2) comprises several current limiters (A1...An) arranged to both sides of junction points (BB1...BBn) of each infeed transformer (T1...Tn) to the ring load busbar / cable system (2) in order to reduce the current in the ring load busbar / cable system (2) in a fault event, characterized in that, the two current limiters (A3, A1; A1, A2; A2, A3) to both sides of the junction point (BB1; BB2; BB3) of the faulted infeed transformer (T1; T2; T3) are simultaneously tripped in order to reduce the current in the ring load busbar / cable system (2) in a fault event.