Ring-Gate Dynamic Comparator for Faster Low-Delta Voltage Settling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dynamic comparators, particularly edge-tracking type comparators, suffer from increased stabilization time and power consumption as the difference between compared voltages decreases, leading to inefficiencies in applications like successive approximation analog-to-digital converters.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic comparator design with a ring of logic gates, where each gate is controllable and biased differently to prevent switching based on the state of associated gates, reducing settling time and power consumption by blocking the propagation of slower edges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If edge-tracking type dynamic comparator is used, then comparison speed is improved, but power consumption increases and stabilization time increases as voltage difference decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomparison speedVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic biasing of logic gates within a ring oscillator structure, where bias conditions change based on the comparison process state. This dynamic adjustment allows the comparator to operate at high speed during active comparison while reducing power consumption during stabilization, resolving the contradiction between speed and power usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The ring oscillator structure with controllable gates creates periodic oscillation that enables the comparator to achieve rapid stabilization through oscillatory convergence rather than gradual settling. This periodic action allows fast comparison speed while limiting overall power consumption through controlled oscillation cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Speed

If edge-tracking type dynamic comparator is used, then comparison speed is improved, but stabilization time increases as voltage difference decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomparison speedVSAvoidstabilization time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The dynamic biasing mechanism adjusts gate thresholds during the comparison process, enabling the ring oscillator to rapidly converge to a stable state. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain high comparison speed while reducing stabilization time, even for small voltage differences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The ring oscillator structure provides inherent feedback where the output of each logic gate feeds back to control the next gate's switching behavior. This feedback mechanism accelerates stabilization by creating self-correcting oscillations that quickly dampen to a stable final state, reducing stabilization time without sacrificing comparison speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4012924B1Dynamic comparator
Publication Date: 2025.12.03 COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES
  • EP4012924B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4012924B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5

AI summary

This description relates to a comparator (2) comprising a ring of gates (110A, 110B, 110A', 110B', 106, 108) in series, in which: each gate implements an inverting function between a first input (100) and an output (102) of the gate; at least one (110A', 110B') gate is controllable and is associated with another gate; each controllable gate (110A', 110B') includes a control input (116) connected to the output (102) of said associated gate, and prevents its output (102) from switching to a high state if its control input (116) is high, and to a low state otherwise; and the control input (116) of each controllable door (110A', 110B') receives the output (102) of said associated door if an even number of doors separates these two doors, and receives the complement of said output otherwise.