RIO Framework for Neural Network Uncertainty Quantification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Standard neural networks lack the ability to quantify predictive uncertainty, and existing approaches that attempt to address this issue require significant modifications to the model infrastructure and training pipeline, making them computationally expensive and harder to implement.

Innovation Solution

The Residual estimation with an I/O kernel (RIO) process estimates predictive uncertainty by training a Gaussian process to model residuals between observed outcomes and neural network predictions, using a composite kernel that incorporates both input and output data, allowing for uncertainty quantification without modifying the neural network structure or training pipeline.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If Bayesian models are combined with neural networks to estimate predictive uncertainty, then uncertainty quantification capability is improved, but model complexity and computational cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuncertainty quantification capabilityVSAvoidmodel infrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a Gaussian Process as an intermediary model that operates independently from the neural network. This GP model takes neural network predictions and true values as training data to learn the residual distribution, thereby providing uncertainty quantification without requiring modifications to the neural network's Bayesian structure. The GP acts as a mediator that bridges the gap between standard NN predictions and uncertainty estimates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the uncertainty estimation task from the neural network prediction task. Instead of integrating uncertainty estimation into the NN architecture (which would increase complexity), the solution separates them into two independent components: the standard neural network for predictions and the Gaussian Process for uncertainty estimation. This segmentation allows each component to remain simple while achieving the combined goal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If Bayesian neural networks are used to provide uncertainty information, then predictive uncertainty estimation is improved, but training computational cost and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive uncertainty estimationVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by training the neural network first to obtain predictions and true values, then uses this pre-trained NN output as training data for the Gaussian Process. This sequential approach allows the computationally intensive NN training to be done once, followed by the much faster GP training that only needs to model the residual distribution, significantly reducing total training time compared to end-to-end Bayesian NN training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a lightweight Gaussian Process model that requires minimal training resources compared to full Bayesian neural networks. The GP model is computationally inexpensive to train because it works with the already-computed NN predictions rather than raw input data, making it a 'cheap' solution that can be applied post-hoc to any pre-trained NN without significant additional computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If standard neural networks are used for regression tasks, then computational efficiency and ease of implementation are improved, but uncertainty quantification capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoiduncertainty quantification capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The Gaussian Process serves as an intermediary layer that adds uncertainty quantification capability to standard neural networks without affecting their computational efficiency. The standard NN continues to operate as before, providing fast predictions, while the GP mediator processes these predictions to generate uncertainty estimates, thus preserving the NN's productivity while enhancing its reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing standard neural networks to automatically generate the data needed for uncertainty estimation through their own predictions. The NN's standard forward propagation produces both predictions and the implicit structure needed for residual analysis, which the GP then uses to provide uncertainty quantification. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for external modifications or additional data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20230351162A1Quantifying the Predictive Uncertainty of Neural Networks Via Residual Estimation With I/O Kernel
Publication Date: 2023.11.02 COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS US CORP
  • US20230351162A1 patent drawing
  • US20230351162A1 patent drawing
  • US20230351162A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A residual estimation with an I/O kernel (“RIO”) framework provides estimates of predictive uncertainty of neural networks, and reduces their point-prediction errors. The process captures neural network (“NN”) behavior by estimating their residuals with an I/O kernel using a modified Gaussian process (“GP”). RIO is applicable to real-world problems, and, by using a sparse GP approximation, scales well to large datasets. RIO can be applied directly to any pretrained NNs without modifications to model architecture or training pipeline.