Ripper Depth Control via Electro-Hydraulic Cylinder Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual control of ripper depth on construction equipment requires significant operator skill and time, as adjusting the ripper shank depth involves physically repositioning pins, which is inefficient and prone to errors.

Innovation Solution

An automatic ripper depth control system that electronically senses the lift cylinder length and uses an electro-hydraulic controller to limit the ripper depth, preventing excessive engagement with the ground by processing operator inputs and sensor signals to adjust the ripper lift and pitch cylinder commands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual control method is used to adjust ripper depth by repositioning pins, then the ripper depth can be adjusted, but it requires significant operator skill and time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator skill and time requirementVSAvoidadjustment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical pin-repositioning system with an electronic control system. The electro-hydraulic controller receives operator inputs and automatically actuates the lift cylinder to adjust ripper depth, eliminating the need for manual pin handling and mechanical repositioning operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service depth adjustment where the operator simply inputs desired depth parameters, and the automated control system independently executes the adjustment by controlling the hydraulic cylinder actuation, without requiring operator intervention in the mechanical adjustment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual pin repositioning is used to change ripper length, then depth adjustment is achieved, but it is prone to errors and requires considerable skill

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth control accuracyVSAvoidoperator skill requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes the mechanical pin-repositioning method with an electronic control system that uses sensor feedback and automated actuation. The system electronically controls the lift cylinder based on operator inputs, eliminating manual mechanical operations that are prone to human error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensor feedback to monitor the actual ripper depth and compares it with the desired depth parameter. The electro-hydraulic controller uses this feedback information to automatically adjust the lift cylinder actuation, ensuring accurate depth control without relying on operator skill or manual measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If electronic sensing and control system is implemented, then operator effort and skill requirements are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator effort and skill requirementVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electro-hydraulic controller serves multiple functions: it processes operator inputs, receives sensor feedback, calculates required cylinder actuation, and controls the hydraulic system. By consolidating these functions into a single integrated controller, the system manages complexity through functional integration rather than separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes a hydraulic actuation system controlled by an electro-hydraulic controller. The hydraulic system provides the necessary force and smooth actuation for ripper depth adjustment, leveraging the strengths of hydraulic technology to achieve precise control with automated actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system enables precise and efficient control of ripper depth, reducing operator effort and skill requirements, while ensuring consistent and optimal engagement with the ground, thereby improving operational efficiency and reducing the risk of errors.

Implementation Method 1

The lift cylinder sensor senses the position of the ripper lift cylinder and generates a lift cylinder position signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPosition sensing:

Implementation Method 2

the pitch cylinder sensor senses the position of the ripper pitch cylinder and generates a pitch cylinder position signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPosition sensing:

Implementation Method 3

The ripper electro-hydraulic controller processes the operator lift signal, the lift cylinder position signal and the ripper depth limit; and generates and outputs ripper lift cylinder commands

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectro-hydraulic control:

Implementation Method 4

The ripper lift cylinder commands can be output to a ripper lift spool valve controlling the raising and lowering of the ripper

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic control: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentUS8720595B2Depth limiting of ripper attachment by electronically limiting cylinder length
Publication Date: 2014.05.13 DEERE & CO
  • US8720595B2 patent drawing
  • US8720595B2 patent drawing
  • US8720595B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A ripper depth limit system and method that includes a lift input for operator controls to raise and lower the ripper, a depth limit input, a lift sensor input that senses the ripper lift cylinder position, and a controller that processes the inputs to generate, execute and revise ripper lift cylinder commands that keep the ripper above the ripper depth limit. The depth limit input can select the ripper depth limit from a plurality of predefined depth limits, or between minimum and maximum ripper depths, or by some other method. The ripper depth limit system can also include a pitch input for operator controls of ripper pitch, and a pitch sensor that senses ripper pitch cylinder position, and the controller can process the pitch inputs to generate, execute and revise ripper pitch and lift cylinder commands that keep the ripper above the ripper depth limit.