Risk-Adjusted Burn Outcome Prediction Across Healthcare Centers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Burn care centers face variability in patient mortality and length of stay (LOS) outcomes, with traditional estimates being inconsistent across patients and centers, hindering quality assessment and improvement.

Innovation Solution

A risk-adjusted statistical model using gradient boosted regression, such as CatBoost, is trained on anonymized patient data from multiple healthcare centers to predict mortality and LOS, providing patient-specific insights and center performance comparisons.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional LOS estimation methods (1 day per % TBSA) are used, then the calculation is simple and quick, but the precision and reliability of the estimate deteriorates due to variability across patients and centers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation speedVSAvoidLOS estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the traditional single-parameter estimation (1 day per % TBSA) into a multi-parameter predictive model that incorporates patient demographics, burn characteristics, comorbidities, and center-specific factors. This parameter expansion resolves the contradiction by maintaining computational efficiency through structured data processing while dramatically improving LOS estimation accuracy through risk adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a machine learning model as an intermediary between raw patient data and LOS prediction. This intermediary layer processes complex interactions among multiple variables, enabling accurate predictions without requiring direct complex calculations. The model acts as a mediator that translates clinical data into precise LOS estimates while accounting for center-specific variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If center-specific traditional estimates are used, then the method is easy to implement at individual centers, but the reliability deteriorates due to lack of standardization across centers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation easeVSAvoidquality assessment reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops a universal predictive model that functions across multiple burn centers with consistent methodology. The model incorporates center-specific random effects, allowing it to adapt to local characteristics while maintaining standardized prediction algorithms. This universality enables reliable cross-center comparisons and quality assessment while remaining implementable at individual centers through standardized software deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If complex machine learning models are trained on large datasets, then the prediction precision improves, but the computational resources and time required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutcome prediction precisionVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary model training on comprehensive datasets during the development phase, creating a pre-trained predictive model that can be deployed for rapid predictions. This preliminary action separates the computationally intensive training process from the prediction phase, allowing high precision predictions to be made with minimal real-time computational resources. The model is prepared in advance to handle complex interactions without requiring extensive computing power during actual patient assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If traditional mortality assessment methods are used, then the assessment process is simple, but the ability to identify quality improvement opportunities deteriorates due to insufficient granularity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment complexityVSAvoidquality metric detail
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the mortality and LOS prediction into multiple independent components, including patient-level risk factors, center-level effects, and interaction terms. This segmentation allows the model to maintain manageable complexity while capturing detailed information about specific quality drivers. Each segment can be independently analyzed to identify quality improvement opportunities, providing granular insights without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250308707A1Systems and methods for predicting outcomes of burn patients
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 BDATA INC
  • US20250308707A1 patent drawing
  • US20250308707A1 patent drawing
  • US20250308707A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed technology includes a method for determining outcomes of patients across healthcare centers, the method including: receiving, at a computer system, patient data for patients in healthcare centers, training, using machine learning techniques and a portion of the data for the burn patients, a predictive model to predict patient outcomes based on assessing patient data for patients across the healthcare centers, and returning the trained predictive model for runtime use. During runtime use, the method can include: providing the patient data as input to the predictive model, receiving, as output, predicted patient outcomes for at least one patient amongst the patients in the healthcare centers, generating, based on the predicted patient outcomes, at least one care recommendation, generating output representative of the predicted patient outcomes and the care recommendation, and transmitting the output to a user computing device for presentation in a graphical user interface (GUI) display.