Integrated Risk Analysis Using Monte Carlo Attack Simulations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current risk analysis and management systems are expensive, time-consuming, and often result in inaccurate qualitative ratings due to assessor fatigue and lack of standardized industry definitions, leading to over-normalized data and inappropriate mitigation strategies without considering business costs or process impacts.

Innovation Solution

A computer-readable medium that generates risk analysis reports by identifying attack types, obtaining protection data, performing Monte Carlo simulations, and determining vulnerabilities, allowing for standardized qualitative assessments and contextualized mitigation recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If quantitative security assessments are performed with extensive modeling and highly detailed data, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and loss of time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment accuracyVSAvoiddata input complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex risk assessment process into distinct modules: data collection module, Monte Carlo simulation module, wildcard detection module, and reporting module. Each module handles specific aspects of the assessment, allowing the system to manage complexity through functional decomposition while maintaining high measurement precision through specialized processing in each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining attack types, requirements, and protection measures in a structured database before the actual assessment. This preliminary structuring of data models and relationships enables the system to conduct rapid Monte Carlo simulations without requiring extensive real-time data input, thus improving assessment speed while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If Monte Carlo simulations are performed with wildcard detection and additional simulations, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability identification accuracyVSAvoidsimulation execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback through wildcard detection that monitors simulation results and identifies uncertain variables. When wildcards are detected, the system automatically triggers additional targeted simulations to refine the analysis. This feedback mechanism ensures high measurement precision by focusing computational resources on critical uncertainties rather than uniformly increasing simulation counts, thus optimizing the balance between accuracy and time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If extensive mitigation strategies are recommended without considering business cost, then reliability is improved, but loss of substance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protection levelVSAvoidbusiness resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters of mitigation recommendations by incorporating business cost and resource constraints as explicit parameters in the analysis. Rather than providing fixed extensive mitigation strategies, the system adjusts recommendation parameters based on the organization's specific resource availability, risk tolerance, and business context, enabling reliable security protection that is sustainable within actual business constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12613972B2Flexible risk assessment and management system for integrated risk and value analysis
Publication Date: 2026.04.28 BUTCHKO INC
  • US12613972B2 patent drawing
  • US12613972B2 patent drawing
  • US12613972B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Providing a risk analysis report for an undesired event includes receiving a request comprising undesired event data defining an undesired event, wherein the undesired event data corresponds to an asset, identifying, from an attack database, one or more sets of attack attributes related to the undesired event data, and identifying one or more protection measures relevant to the asset and the attack attributes. The technique also includes performing a first set of Monte Carlo simulations for the undesired event based on combinations of the attack attributes, the protection measures, and the asset, and performing a second set of Monte Carlo simulations for the undesired event based on a subset of the combinations of the attack attribute. One or more combinations of the attack attributes, the protection measures, and the asset which result in the undesired event are provided in accordance with outcomes.