Risk Analysis Device for Service Availability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for improving service availability fail to effectively present and remove multiple risk factors simultaneously, as they lack a method to account for the interdependencies between risk factors influencing service execution.

Innovation Solution

A risk analysis device and method that compute influence degrees for each risk factor based on its relation to other components and services, and generate risk groups by identifying similarities among these factors, allowing for targeted removal of interdependent risk factors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing systems analyze risk factors independently without considering interdependencies, then the analysis process is simple, but the ability to improve service availability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice availabilityVSAvoidrisk analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments risk factors into distinct entities with independent characteristics (failure rate, recovery rate) while maintaining relationships between them. Each risk factor is analyzed as a separate unit with defined parameters, allowing systematic evaluation of interdependencies without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary analysis layer that computes influence degrees and similarity measures between risk factors. This intermediary layer translates complex interdependencies into quantifiable metrics (influence degree, similarity score) that facilitate systematic risk group formation while maintaining analytical tractability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple risk factors are analyzed simultaneously considering their interdependencies, then the accuracy of availability improvement is improved, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk analysis precisionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the analysis by changing parameters into standardized metrics: influence degree (quantifying impact on service availability) and similarity score (measuring relationship strength between risk factors). These parameter transformations enable precise multi-factor analysis while keeping computations manageable through normalized scales.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by focusing computational resources on risk factors with high influence degrees and strong similarity scores. Instead of uniformly analyzing all risk factors equally, the system prioritizes those most critical to service availability, reducing overall computational burden while maintaining precision for key risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If risk factors are presented and removed individually, then the management process is simple, but the efficiency of availability improvement is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavailability improvement efficiencyVSAvoidrisk management ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges risk factors into groups based on their similarity scores and influence degrees. Risk factors with high similarity (e.g., similar failure patterns, interconnected components) are combined into risk groups, allowing administrators to address multiple risks simultaneously through unified management actions, thereby improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis to compute influence degrees and similarity scores before actual risk removal decisions are made. This preliminary grouping of risk factors into manageable sets enables administrators to prepare and execute comprehensive availability improvement plans more efficiently, rather than reacting to individual risks in isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9898525B2Information processing device which carries out risk analysis and risk analysis method
Publication Date: 2018.02.20 NEC CORP
  • US9898525B2 patent drawing
  • US9898525B2 patent drawing
  • US9898525B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing device includes: a unit configured to compute a service influence degree for each risk factor with respect to each service, on the basis of information which indicates a relation between components which have the risk factors and other components which are influenced by the state of the components, information which denotes characteristics of the respective risk factors, and information which denotes a correspondence between the services and these components; and a unit configured to compute, on the basis of the computed service influence degrees, similarities between specific risk factors and other risk factors, and for generating and outputting a set of component identification information on the basis of the computed similarities.