Risk Assessment for Compromised Payment Cards

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The growing number of compromised credit cards in circulation poses a challenge for financial institutions, as they lack a systematic way to prioritize the risk of fraud for each card, leading to inefficient resource allocation in mitigation efforts.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method to assess the risk of compromised payment cards by gathering data from malicious marketplaces, identifying trends in purchases, and generating risk scores based on correlation strengths, allowing financial institutions to prioritize cards deemed most risky.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional mitigation sends digital lists of compromised credit cards to financial institutions, then all compromised cards are identified, but financial institutions cannot prioritize which cards to address first due to lack of risk differentiation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the uniform list of compromised cards into differentiated risk categories by analyzing individual card characteristics (age, source, marketplace activity). This segmentation transforms a single undifferentiated list into multiple risk-stratified groups, enabling prioritized mitigation while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary risk assessment system that sits between the data collection phase and the mitigation phase. This intermediary analyzes card attributes and generates risk scores, serving as a mediator that translates raw compromised card data into actionable prioritization signals for financial institutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If financial institutions proactively replace all compromised payment cards, then fraud risk is minimized, but resource allocation becomes inefficient due to the large volume of cards requiring attention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud mitigation effectivenessVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by treating different compromised cards differently based on their individual risk profiles. Instead of uniform mitigation, high-risk cards receive immediate attention while lower-risk cards are monitored or addressed later, optimizing resource allocation according to local (individual card) characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of card risk assessment from binary (compromised/not compromised) to a continuous risk score spectrum. This parameter transformation enables differentiated response strategies based on risk magnitude, allowing institutions to allocate resources proportionally to threat levels rather than treating all cards equally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If financial institutions take a wait-and-see approach to compromised cards, then resource consumption is reduced, but the ability to prevent fraud is diminished

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidfraud prevention capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables preliminary action by providing risk assessments before fraud incidents occur. Financial institutions can proactively replace or monitor high-risk cards based on predicted fraud likelihood, preventing fraud before it happens rather than reacting after compromise is detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary anti-action by identifying and neutralizing high-risk compromised cards before they can be used for fraud. The risk assessment system predicts which cards are most likely to be used fraudulently and enables preemptive mitigation actions against those specific cards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Quantity of substance

If the number of compromised payment cards increases, then the scale of potential fraud grows, but the ability to manually assess and respond to each card becomes overwhelmed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of compromised cardsVSAvoidmitigation operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the system to automatically assess risk and generate prioritization lists without manual intervention. The automated risk assessment engine processes large volumes of compromised card data and produces actionable intelligence, freeing institutions from manually evaluating each card's risk level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical assessment processes with automated computational analysis. Instead of human analysts reviewing each compromised card, computerized algorithms analyze card attributes and generate risk scores, scaling the operation to handle large volumes efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10296918B1Providing risk assessments to compromised payment cards
Publication Date: 2019.05.21 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US10296918B1 patent drawing
  • US10296918B1 patent drawing
  • US10296918B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented technique provides a compromised payment card risk assessment. The technique involves gathering, by processing circuitry, compromised payment card data. The technique further involves identifying, by the processing circuitry, a set of compromised payment cards from the compromised payment card data. The technique further involves providing, in response to identifying the set of compromised payment cards and by the processing circuitry, a compromised payment card assessment report which includes a set of payment card entries corresponding to the set of compromised payment cards. Each payment card entry includes (i) identification data which identifies a respective compromised payment card and (ii) a score which indicates an estimated likelihood that the respective compromised payment card will actually be used for fraud. Such scores may be based on summations of different sub-scores and serve as overall numerical measures of risk.